Skip to main content
iRubric: Panel Discussion rubric

iRubric: Panel Discussion rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Panel Discussion 
Panel Discussion
Students divided into two groups debate a controversial subject. They are assigned roles including constructive speaker, questioner and rebuttal speaker
Rubric Code: L233596
By RegieAmores
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Panel Discussion
100 % Enter rubric description
  Exceptional

20 pts

Good

18 pts

Satisfactory

15 pts

Poor

10 pts

Unacceptable

5 pts

Respect for other Panelists
20 %

Exceptional

Panelist is enthusiastic without being abrasive or inconsiderate. He or she plays a leading role in collaboration and inspires effective team efforts. Never interrupts. Models courtesy and civility for peers.
Good

Panelist shows respect for other panelists, never interrupting.
Satisfactory

Panelists show respect for other panelists.
Poor

Panelist does not contribute actively to their team, or demonstrates a lack of cooperation or respect.
Unacceptable

Panelist is blatantly disrespectful or speaks out of turn. Behavior during event significantly detracts from the effectiveness of any presentation.
Analysis and Information
20 %

Enter description
Exceptional

Panelist is clearly well-informed about all issues.
All arguments stated are cogent and convincing. Critical thinking is displayed to an exceptional degree.
Good

Many valid points are raised and clearly analyzed with many indications of higher-level critical thought and consistent efforts to provide appropriate support for claims made.
Satisfactory

Panelist generally shows appreciation for the need to express and defend valid arguments, and seems to know how to distinguish them.
Poor

Panelist demonstrates inadequate efforts to reason carefully regarding the issues under discussion.
Unacceptable

No effort is apparent to analyze the topic, help form valid conclusions or offer valuable information.
Organization
20 %

Enter description
Exceptional

Panelist's presentation is always easy for the audience to follow. Clear patterns of organization are referred to explicitly. Statements of position, questions and rebuttal points are mutually consistent in all cases.
Good

Organization of ideas is generally easy to follow and no major inconsistencies are apparent. Some relevant contrasts with opposing side are made. Most speaking time is effectively used. Speaker seems well prepared and persuades effectively.
Satisfactory

Organization of ideas is sometimes in doubt, but responses are generally relevant and responsive, and clarifications are attempted.
Poor

Needless and significant confusion is introduced into the discussion, but course corrections succeed in clarifying the issues.
Unacceptable

No coherent organization is apparent, and/or questions or responses are clearly irrelevant or non-responsive.
Attentive Listening
20 %

Exceptional

Panelist continuously demonstrates active listening and full comprehension of opposing ideas through accurate re-statement. Advances the ideas of other panelists. Questions, reactions to questions, rebuttals and ready reception of constructive feedback all clearly demonstrate that active listening has occurred throughout.
Good

Panelist offers some more or less accurate re-statements of opposing positions and always demonstrates attentive listening to others. Panelist respectfully absorbs all contributions and feedback from others.
Satisfactory

Some responses indicate a gap in attentive listening, but these are rectified or do not seriously interfere.
Poor

Questions, answers or responses suggest serious flaws in attentive listening.
Unacceptable

Attentive listening has obviously not occurred, in a manner seriously detrimental to team or panel discussion as a whole.
Delivery
20 %

Exceptional

All components of effective and persuasive delivery are present at all times, including projection, inflection, rate, eye contact, fluency, and body language.
Good

Effective and persuasive public speaking skills are almost always present.
Satisfactory

Public speaking skills are under-developed in noticeable ways, but strengths in other areas compensate for these weaknesses.
Poor

Panelist is over-reliant on notes or often inaudible. Makes little effort to persuade or connect with audience.
Unacceptable

No components of effective public speaking are noticeable or the discourse is plainly unintelligible.




Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232