Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Individual research paper oral presentation rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Individual research paper oral presentation
Group proposal presentation
Each student will choose a scientific article from a recommended journal and present a detailed summary. The student will correlate research findings and discussion with objectives of and material covered in the course.
Rubric Code:
KCW9BX
By
profearroyo
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Chemistry
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Team Presentation
Superior
5 pts
Good
4 pts
Fair
3 pts
Poor
2 pts
Content & Development
25 %
Superior
Student has a stronghold on the content, methodology and conclusions of the article and is able to effectively "teach" the class. No mistakes are made with regard to content knowledge.
Good
Student has a basic understanding of the content. Articles findings are effectively communicated but show shortcomings in mastery of the material or in explanation of findings.
Fair
Student has only a superficial or limited understanding of content. Mistakes were made during the presentation. The main findings of the article, methodology or conclusions of the paper are explained incorrectly or not explained clearly.
Poor
Student has little to no understanding of the content addressed in the presentation and does not communicate the findings or methodology of the article clearly.
Conclusion
5 %
Superior
Conclusion reviews information presented, restates the findings and ends with a clear summary of the "take home points" of the article.
Good
Conclusion fails to do ONE of the following: review of information, restatement of findings or summarizing of take home points.
Fair
Conclusion fails to do TWO of the previous criteria.
Poor
Presentation ends without an official conclusion.
Mechanics / Attention to Detail
20 %
Superior
Student pays excellent attention to writing mechanics, visual details, spelling, etc. Presentation has very few or no errors.
Good
Student pays good attention to writing mechanics, visual details, spelling, etc. Presentation has few errors.
Fair
Student pays some attention to writing mechanics, visual details, spelling, etc. Presentation has several errors.
Poor
Student pays no attention to writing mechanics, visual details, spelling, etc. Presentation has many errors.
Graphics / Visual Aids
10 %
Superior
Student's graphics explain and reinforce screen text and presentation. Includes graphic's source when it is not from scientific article being presented.
Visual aids are visually pleasing, non-crowded and work well to support the speaker and convey information.
Good
Student's graphics relate to text and presentation. One graphic is not clear or is difficult to read. Includes graphic's source when it is not from scientific article being presented.
Small mistakes may be present but do not interfere with the effective functioning of the aids.
Fair
Student occasionally uses graphics that rarely support text and presentation. Two graphics are not clear or are difficult to read. Does not includes graphic's source.
Mistakes in the visuals are distracting from the presentation.
Poor
Student uses superfluous graphics or no graphics. Three or more graphics are not clear or are difficult to read. Does not includes graphic's source.
Discussion & Questions
20 %
Superior
Highly encourages peer discussion and interaction. Demonstrates extensive knowledge of the topic by responding confidently, precisely and appropriately to all questions.
Good
Encourages peer discussion and interaction.
Demonstrates knowledge through integration of text reading, and by responding accurately and appropriately addressing questions.
Fair
Reluctantly interacts with peers. Demonstrates some knowledge and rudimentary use of strategy. Is reluctant or responds inaccurately to questions.
Poor
Avoids or discourages active audience participation.
Demonstrates incomplete knowledge of the topic by responding inaccurately and inappropriately to questions.
Organization of PowerPoint
10 %
Superior
Student presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow and engages the viewer with a clear purpose of the paper.
Good
Student presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow. Includes most components of the paper so viewers are clear about the purpose of the paper.
Fair
Student presents information in a logical sequence which audience can follow. Includes the major components but is missing other components of the paper so viewers are not entirely clear about the purpose of the research paper.
Poor
Student presents information in an illogical sequence which the audience cannot follow. The presentation is missing major components which confuses the viewer about the overall purpose of the research paper.
Delivery
10 %
Superior
-Good posture
-Eye contact with the audience most of the time
-Appropriate gesture and expression
-Deliverance with confidence
-No more than three instances of filler words or tag lines
-Minimal use of notes
Good
-Good posture
-Frequent eye contact with the audience
-Appropriate gesture and expression
-No more than five instances of filler words or tag lines
-Student relies too heavily on notes or rambles
Fair
-Intermittent good posture
-Occasional eye contact with the audience
-Appropriate gesture and expression
-Frequent use of filler words or tag lines
-Student reads from notes or seems unrehearsed
Poor
-Poor posture
-Seldom eye contact with the audience
-Not enough or too much gesture and expression
-Excessive use of filler words or tag lines
-Student is obviously unprepared or "winging" it
Keywords:
science, presentation
Subjects:
Chemistry
Education
(General)
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Chemistry rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.