iRubric: Google Earth Tour rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Google Earth Tour Google Earth Tour Using Google Earth, create a tour people can take to see different examples of your chosen natural geographical feature. Rubric Code: K4WX44 By jgreive Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Geography Type: Presentation Grade Levels: 6-8

Google Earth Tour
	Beginning 1 pts	Developing 3 pts	Secure 5 pts
Content All the information that I put into the Google Earth tour.	Beginning Information was inaccurate, not detailed, or was not written in student's own words.	Developing Information was correct and written in own words but did not mix in own ideas and thoughts.	Secure Information was correct, detailed and written in own words. Also mixed in opinions and ideas with facts about the feature.
Visuals All the pictures, charts, and other graphics used to enhance the tour.	Beginning Did not use any visuals, only listed information in each pop-up screen or visual did not make sense with the information being presented.	Developing Used at least 1 visual on every feature and that visual made sense with the information being presented.	Secure Used many visuals for each animal and visuals allowed reader to learn some more information by looking at them.
Objective The presentation was created with the correct purpose.	Beginning At least 1 area was missing from all or most of geographic locations. 1. Type of feature introduced 2. General details (size, location) 3. What makes this special	Developing At least 1 area was missing from some of geographic locations. 1. Type of feature introduced 2. General details (size, location) 3. What makes this special	Secure Each area was thoroughly covered in all locations 1. Type of feature introduced 2. General details (size, location) 3. What makes this special
Presentation How our presentation looked when being viewed by others. (GROUP GRADE)	Beginning Presentation was visually distracting, hard to follow or read, or had many misspelled words.	Developing Presentation was fairly easy to read, most words were spelled correctly, and each location flowed into the next one.	Secure Presentation was easy to read, all words were spelled correctly, and flowed smoothly between each location.