Skip to main content
iRubric: Peer teaching of skill development rubric

iRubric: Peer teaching of skill development rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Peer teaching of skill development 
Copy of Assessment of Teaching Read
This rubric will assess the student in the teaching of a skill to an emancipating youth
Rubric Code: JXBAW4
By gfolaron
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Assessment of Teaching Reading Less
  Excellent

(N/A)

Good

(N/A)

Poor

(N/A)

Introduction to Lesson

Excellent

Introduction to the lesson was enthusiastic, utilized a visual, and stimulated interest in the activity
Good

Introduction to the lesson was somewhat enthusiastic. The worker attempted to stimulate interest. The introduction included a visual but it wasn't very engaging.
Poor

Introduction to the lesson was less than enthusiastic and didn't stimulated interest in the activity. There was no visual or the visual was not relavent or interesting.
Skill Development Component

Excellent

Skill development activity was presented with clarity and included opportunities for the client to practice.
Good

Skill development activity was presented with clarity but did not provide adequate time for the client to practice.
Poor

No skill development activities were included in the lesson or experiential activities were missing which would provide an opportunity for clients to practice.
Presentation Quality

Excellent

Presenter engaged the client and was attuned to the client's learning needs regarding the pacing of the presentation, client's ability to comprehend the information, and included relavent and useful practice tasks
Good

Presenter did not fully engage the client or was not fully attuned to the client's learning needs regarding the pacing of the presentation, client's ability to comprehend the information, or did included relavent and useful practice tasks
Poor

Presenter was unable to keep client engaged or misunderstood client comprehension, questions, or interest.
Content

Excellent

Content of the presentation was relavent, appropriate and important information for emancipating youth.
Good

Content of the presentation included relavent, appropriate or important information for emancipating youth but not all three criteria.
Poor

Content was not relavent, appropriate and important information for emancipating youth.
Organization

Excellent

There was an organized flow to the presentation. Concepts built upon one another. Presenter had everything needed for the presentation.
Good

A little bit unorganized but is still got the points across. Had everything needed for the presentation.
Poor

The information was presented in a confusing manner. The presenter was not prepared with everything needed for the presentation.
Time Limit

Excellent

Presentation was between 18-20 minutes in length. Time was used well and effectively.
Good

Presentation was more than 5 minutes under time but the presenter used the extra time to reinforce the content
Poor

The presentation was more than 5 minutes under time and the presenter used the remaining time inappropriately (e.g. moved into personal issues or side talk)
Visual Aids/Props

Excellent

Presenter effectively used appropriate visual aids which provided an opportunity for the client to practice their new skill. Visual aids appeared to be thoughtfully selected.
Good

Presenter brought visual aids to support learning but only minimally used them to support learning. Some thought and effort appeared to be put into the choice of visual aids but more effort would may have improved the presentation.
Poor

Presenter did not bring in visual aids or brought in visual aids that were not particularly helpful in supporting skill development or reinforcing learning. Minimal thought or effort appeared to be put into the choice of visual aids
Handouts

Excellent

Presenter brought a well organized handout which summarized the content and provided additional information such as addresses or phone numbers that will move the client forward. Handouts were written at a 6th grade reading level.
Good

Presenter brought a handout but the content was not fully organized or the handout did not contain a summary of the content or lacked addresses or phone numbers that could move the client forward. Handouts were written above a 6th grade reading level.
Poor

No handout was provided.



Keywords:
  • Assessment, teaching, social work, skill development



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60