Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Clinical Practicum Portfolio rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
(draft)
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Clinical Practicum Portfolio
Rubric Code:
JX372X4
By
profspiveyslp
Draft
Private Rubric
Subject:
(General)
Type:
Assessment
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Enter rubric title
Needs Significant Improvements
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Average
3 pts
Exemplary
4 pts
Client/Case Introduction
Needs Significant Improvements
0% of the information is included
Unsatisfactory
25% of the information is included
Fair
50% of the information is included
Average
75% of the information is included
Exemplary
The client/case introduction provides a complete description of the client including:
-diagnostic information
-client personal information
-full description of treatment history
-baseline data obtained this semester
-treatment plan for this semester
Clinical Writing
Needs Significant Improvements
There are 3 or more mechanical errors throughout the documents
Unsatisfactory
Clinical terms are used erroneously 2 or more times. There is an overuse of professional jargon. The information is not presented in a logical sequence. There are no more than 2 mechanical errors. There are 2 ore more errors in formatting.
Fair
Clinical terms are used erroneously 2 or more times. There is an overuse of professional jargon. The information is presented in a logical sequence. There are no more than 2 grammatical or spelling errors. There is appropriate formatting.
Average
Clinical terms are used erroneously one time. There is a balance of use of clinical terms and non discipline specific language. The information is presented in a logical sequence. There are no more than 2 mechanical errors. There is appropriate formatting.
Exemplary
Clinical terms are used accurately and appropriately. There is a balance of use of clinical terms and non discipline specific language. The information is presented in a logical sequence. There are no more than 2 mechanical errors. There is appropriate formatting.
SOAP Notes
Needs Significant Improvements
n/a
Unsatisfactory
n/a
Fair
S:Report of information that does not impact performance; Overuse of simplified language;
O-Subjective language; objectives not measurable; session STOs not reported;
A-Inconsistent and incohesive reporting from 'S' and 'O' statements; 3+ missed opportunities for professional terminology; 2+ statements of materials used with limited discussion of clinical implications; Irrelevant use of examples for 1+ objective;
P:Restated LTGs/STOs; Incohesive reporting from prev
Average
S -Client's disposition described using objective language;tied to client/family reporting
O-STOs missing measurable target behaviors; inconsistent unit of measure btw raw data and target criterion; Missing supports
A-Missing comparative data; 2-3 instances of improper use of professional terms; Discussion of clinical implications throughout 1/2 of the reporting; Vague reporting of client response to intervention.
P-1+ statement re: activities; Reporting partially cohesive
Exemplary
S:Objective brief and concise statements distinctively related to performance
O-Target behaviors measurable and reliable; Complete STOs; Consistent units of measure btw raw data and target criterion;
A-Clinical implications discussed; Clear, analytical discussion of client response to intervention; Consistent reporting of comparative data across performance; No new information reported.
P:Individualized, associated to session performance to facilitate subsequent sessio
SIP
Needs Significant Improvements
n/a
Unsatisfactory
n/a
Fair
Intervention plan lacks in one of the following areas: therapeutic, developmentally appropriate, or child centered. There is inconsistent evidence that the clinician's reflections have been implemented in the subsequent SIP. Rationale is data based or evidence based.
Average
Intervention plan is therapeutic, developmentally appropriate, and child centered. There is inconsistent evidence that the clinician's reflections have been implemented in the subsequent SIP. Rationale is data based or evidence based.
Exemplary
Intervention plan is therapeutic, developmentally appropriate, and child centered. There is evidence that the clinician's reflections have been implemented in the subsequent SIP. Rationale is data based and evidence based.
Reflection Forms
Needs Significant Improvements
There are no discussion topics covered
Unsatisfactory
The reflection is less than 2 paragraphs and/or
one out of four discussion topics are covered
Fair
The reflection is less than 2 paragraphs and/or
two out of four discussion topics are covered
Average
The reflection is less than 2 paragraphs and/or
three out of four discussion topics are covered
Exemplary
There is a minimum of 2 paragraphs. Discussion must include the following information.
-Evidence that the clinician has considered their actions and demeanor in addition to the client's disposition.
-Data based discussion regarding client performance
-Analysis of client's performance
-Comparison of client's performance and clinician's expectations
-Plan for the following session that is data based and client centered
Artifacts
Needs Significant Improvements
There are no artifacts
Unsatisfactory
n/a
Fair
Less than 50% of the artifacts are included and/or less than 50% of artifacts have a justifaction
Average
There are the required number of artifacts but there are 1-2 missing justifications
Exemplary
There are at least 4 artifacts included per grading period. Including but not limited to:
-completed data sheets
-therapy materials
-SIP or SOAP peer feedback form completed by a classmate for your client
-website that contains therapy ideas
-recap of parent/caregiver conversation
-homework
You must provide a brief description for each artifact that includes it's relevance to the client and feedback on how the artifact contributed to the overall
Content
Needs Significant Improvements
0% of the documents are complete and located in the portfolio
Unsatisfactory
25% of the documents are complete and located in the portfolio
Fair
50% of the documents are complete and located in the portfolio
Average
75% of the documents are complete and located in the portfolio
Exemplary
100% of the documents are complete and located in the portfolio
Subjects:
(General)
Types:
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More (General) rubrics
More Assessment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to
ready to use
.
Share
Add to Gallery
Let others view this rubric in Rubric Gallery.
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.