Skip to main content

iRubric: Persuasion Speech Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Persuasion Speech Rubric 
Students will give a persuasion speech with a thematic focus on power. They will be assessed on content, delivery, and written work.
Rubric Code: J99W62
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Persuasion Presentation Grading
  Above Standard

10 pts

Meets Standard

7.5 pts

Below Standard

5 pts

Not Evident

2.5 pts

Introduction

Above Standard

ATTENTION STEP:
Excellent attention-getter. Related to audience, credibility established, gave very brief introduction of topic, and stated claim, (i.e. point you'll be trying to prove)previewed the main points. Clearly stated the relevance of topic to audience needs and interests.
Meets Standard

The speaker introduced the speech adequately, including an attention getter and a preview of the main points of the speech. Claim wasn't clearly expressed. Relevance of topic to audience needs and interests was somewhat apparent.
Below Standard

The speaker introduced the speech, but some details were unclear. The introduction lacked an attention getter and/or a preview of main points.
Not Evident

The speaker failed to introduce the speech OR the introduction was not useful in indicating what the speech was about.
Body

Above Standard

Motivated Sequence in the body of the speech. Main points work within the steps and are clearly distinguished with supporting details. Transitions are effectively used for coherent movement from point to point.
Meets Standard

General body organization resembled Monroe's Motivated Sequence but some steps weren't clear or well-developed. Transitions were okay, but not as unique or distinct as the could be.
Below Standard

The speaker somewhat related Monroe's Motivated Sequence to the organizational format,, but the steps --(need, satisfaction, visualization) lacked detail to the extent that some persuasive impact was compromised. Transitions need work.
Not Evident

The speech was difficult to follow due to a lack of organization. Little detail was given to support the main points. Difficult to identify introduction, body, and conclusion.
PATHOS (emotional appeal)

Above Standard

Effectively and ethically appeals to audience emotions (anger, status, power, fear, compassion, etc.) to achieve the persuasive goal. Vivid and emotive language effectively used to create imagery to engage audience emotionally. At least three rhetorical devices were used.
Meets Standard

Appeals to audience emotions (anger, fear, compassion, status, etc.) to achieve the persuasive goal, but fails to use enough pathos to really move audience, didn't completely observe ethical responsibilities. Creates some effective imagery through language. At least two rhetorical devices were used.
Below Standard

Minimal appeal to audience emotions (anger, fear, status, compassion, etc.) for persuasive goal; fails to observe ethical responsibilities. Creates some effective imagery through language. At least one rhetorical device was used.
Not Evident

Fails to appropriately appeal to audience emotions. No attempt to use vivid or descriptive language to capture audience emotions.
Fallacies used instead of ethical appeals. No obvious use of rhetorical devices.
LOGOS (logical appeal)

Above Standard

Presents sound arguments to support major claim. Arguments are supported with sufficient, relevant and valid evidence. Reasoning is free of fallacies.Addressed oppositional arguments in a fair and persuasive manner. All four sources are cited aloud and are credible.
Meets Standard

Some arguments are sufficiently supported but some unsupported assertions are also present. Minor reasoning present. Oppositional argument somewhat addressed. Most sources are credible and cited aloud.
Below Standard

Arguments lack some relevant and solid evidence. Credibility of sources and/or information is questionable. Many fallacies are present in the reasoning. Oppositional arguments not present or not very apparent. Less than two sources are credible and/or cited aloud.
Not Evident

Arguments lack relevant and valid evidence. Information is incorrect and/or outdated. Many fallacies are present in the reasoning. Sources either aren't credible or not cited in presentation.
Conclusion

Above Standard

Brakelight alerted audience to the presentation conclusion. The speaker summarized the main points, tied back to the introduction to bring the speech full circle, and left the audience with a specific call to action and a powerful clincher
Meets Standard

Brakelight alerted audience to the presentation conclusion.The speaker recaped main points but missed at least one key component of conclusion (call to action, clincher, tie-back to intro...etc.)
Below Standard

Brakelight was weak or not present; the speaker concluded the speech in a disorganized fashion. Two or more important components were not present.
Not Evident

No brakelight, conclusion ended rather abruptly. Most parts of conclusion were missing.
NV Voice

Above Standard

Natural variation of vocal characteristics (pace, pitch, power, pauses, articulation) in Standard English to heighten interest and match message appropriately. Few, if any, verbal fillers.
Meets Standard

Some limited variation of vocal characteristics. Use of pace, pitch, power and pauses seemed inconsistent at times. Some verbal fillers.
Below Standard

The student could be heard most of the time but at certain points were inaudible and/or inarticulate. Little pitch variation. Pacing was too slow/fast. Verbal fillers were noticable and frequent.
Not Evident

Audience had difficulty hearing and/or understanding much of the speech due to monotone or inappropriate variation of vocal characteristics. Inconsistent with verbal message. Excessive fluency errors interfered with message comprehension. Excessive use of vocalized fillers.
NV Eye Contact

Above Standard

Consistently and effectively used eye contact to establish rapport with audience. Inconspicuous use of speaker notes and effective use of scanning to established an expanded zone of interaction.
Meets Standard

The speaker looked up occasionally and focused on just a few people during the speech. Some use of speaker notes. Seemed a bit disengaged from audience for short periods of time.
Below Standard

Conspicuous use of speaker notes. Seems disengaged from audience for noticeable periods of time.
Not Evident

The speaker seldom looked at the audience. Reads speech from notes. Avoided eye contact with audience. Only occasional and sporadic glances.
NV Body

Above Standard

Facial expressions were comfortable and showed enthusiasm for the topic. Expressive, dynamic, and natural use of gestures, posture and facial expressions to reinforce and enhance meaning. Body language reflects comfort interacting with audience. The speaker maintained good posture.
Meets Standard

Facial expressions were comfortable.
Gestures were fine--though were limited. Increase use of gestures to reinforce verbal message.
Below Standard

Facial expressions seemed forced or absent. Stiff or unnatural use of nonverbal behaviors. Body language reflects some discomfort interacting with audience. Limited use of gestures to reinforce verbal message.
Not Evident

The speaker's posture and expression indicated a lack of enthusiasm or comfortableness with the speech. Some gestures were a bit distracting.Body language reflects a reluctance to interact with audience. Use of self-adaptive, repetitive or nervous behaviors.
NV MOVEMENT/SPACE

Above Standard

Movements were purposeful and enhanced the delivery of the speech. Space was used well (front and center).
Meets Standard

The speaker had adequate and non-distracting movement during the speech. Decent use of speaking space (front of room)
Below Standard

The speaker had some distracting movement during delivery. Space wasn't used to the advantage of the speaker (stayed in one place the whole time)
Not Evident

Movements were distracting (pacing or monotonous). Use of space was not considered by the speaker (potted plant)



Keywords:
  • persuasion, speech, presentation







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178