Skip to main content
iRubric: LS 04 Summer 2012 Final Project (100 Points) rubric

iRubric: LS 04 Summer 2012 Final Project (100 Points) rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
LS 04 Summer 2012 Final Project (100 Points) 
LS 04 Summer 2012 Miidterm Project (100 Points)
Project is: 1. Is authentic. 2. Answers the questions or responds to the statements. 3. Contains examples and details to support opinions and thoughts. 4. Shows personal perspective. 5. Is easily understood by the reader. It is free of spelling mistakes as well as confusing language.
Rubric Code: J7AB95
By antarghosha
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric LS04 Midterm Project
  Exceeds Competency

Effort at this level evidences mastery of the material and is graded as "A-" or "A"

25 pts

Meets Competency

Effort at this level represents developmentally appropriate understanding of the material therefore graded in the "B" to "B+" range

20 pts

Developing Competency

Effort at this level represents slightly less than developmentally appropriate understanding of the material therefore graded in the "B-" to "C" range

15 pts

Below Competency

Effort at this level is less than expected and is graded as "C- or below"

10 pts

Response Completion
40 %

Exceeds Competency

Student exhibits a defined and clear understanding of the assignment. Orderly and concise. Easy to follow the distillation of weekly notes. Addition to mid-term myths and excellent reporting on additional myths. Demonstrates an in depth understanding of the original thoughts and reporting of the expansion or change in those understandings. Contains thorough supporting statements relevant to the subject.
Meets Competency

Student offers effective understanding of the assignment.Most of the thoughts are easily followed by the reader. Addition to mid-term is above average. New information demonstrates above average willingness to research and expand original thoughts. Reports an understanding of why there is a change (or not) of the original thought. Contains supporting statements relevant to the subject.
Developing Competency

Student exhibits basic understanding of the assignment. Thoughts are sometimes logical and other times confusing to the reader. generally effective responses to all components of the assignment. Additional clarification of the mid-term is good. New information demonstrates basic understanding of the assignment. Responses are simple but show moderate insight, depth, or connection to the original assignment. Some support statements relate to the subject.
Below Competency

Simple responses that lack insight, depth, or are superficial. Entries tend to be short and somewhat irrelevant to the key question. Has not or minimal has expanded midterm project work. Does not express opinion clearly and often statements do not relate to assignment.
Organization of Ideas
20 %

Exceeds Competency

Student thoroughly understands and excels in explaining all major points. Offers documentation from class/group/speaker interactions , movies and other research are duly noted. An original, unique, and/or imaginative concepts clearly stated. Overall format of assignment includes well- developed content.
Meets Competency

Student thoroughly understands and is above average in explaining all major points. An original, unique, and/or imaginative approach to overall ideas and concepts are almost always clearly stated. . Overall format of assignment includes developed content carried over from midterm and with added myths for final. Includes class documentation from groups/speaker/movies and research.
Most project guidelines are followed.
Developing Competency

Student doesn't clearly demonstrate myths and how he/she changed or solidified those beliefs. Paper lacks a smooth flow of the ideas and concepts from the midterm to the final project. Additional myths are not well developed. appear to understand the major points. Student uses some framework that evidences some a basic understanding of ideas and concepts throughout the writing. Students includes one or two notations from the interaction and research. Some project guidelines are followed.
Below Competency

Assignment reveals lack of organization and doesn't seem to understand the flow from the midterm to the final project. Student does not include any documentation from class/group/speaker/movies or other research. Student does not follow the guidelines of:
12 point font
Time New Roman or Ariel
1” margins
Double spaced
Proof read
Spell checked.
One class-site or research bibliography per page.
Self & Peer Evaluation
20 %

Exceeds Competency

Clearly evaluates and illustrates personal and group members strengths and assigns appropriate percentage points as related to the group meetings and assignment. Student offers concrete examples.
Meets Competency

Evaluates and illustrates as appropriate personal and group member strengths and assigns percentage points as related to the group meetings and assignment. Student offers some concrete examples.
Developing Competency

Evaluates self and group with general illustrations leaving out particulars. Student offers broad or non specific examples.
Below Competency

Unable or does not evaluate self or group members. Student does not offer any examples of group meeting.
Grammar and Mechanics
20 %

Exceeds Competency

Student demonstrates an excellent command of grammar, has three or less spelling errors, and presents the project in a structure/format that enhances readability.
Meets Competency

Student provides an effective display of good writing and grammar. Assignment reflects student’s ability to select appropriate word usage and present an above average presentation of a given topic or issue. Assignment appears to be well written with no more than 3-5 errors.
Developing Competency

Assignment reflects basic writing and grammar, but more than 5 errors. Student’s writing ability is average, and demonstrates a basic understanding of the subject matter.
Below Competency

Topics, concepts, and ideas are not coherently discussed or expressed in assignments. Student’s writing style is weak and needs improvement. Student needs to review and revise project for final presentation.



Keywords:
  • rubric graduate writing


Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232