Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Writing Assignments Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Writing Assignments Rubric
Writing Assignments Rubric
Rubric for evaluating written assignments.
Rubric Code:
J47CWB
By
comiteavaluo
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
(General)
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
(none)
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Criterion
Does not Meet Standards
20 pts
Needs Improvement
25 pts
Meets Standards
32 pts
Exceeds Standards
35 pts
Ideas and Content
25 %
Does not Meet Standards
- Lacks coherence; incomplete.
- Major points are not clear and/or persuasive.
- Displays a superficial or incorrect understanding of course material.
Needs Improvement
- Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
- Major points are addressed.
- Research is inadequate or does not address course concepts.
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Meets Standards
- Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
- Major points are stated clearly.
- Uses appropriate references.
- Addresses course concepts.
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Exceeds Standards
- Content is thorough, accurate, and persuasive. Purpose of the writing is clear.
- Major points are specific and stated clearly.
- Reflects a high level of analysis and interpretation.
- Writing is persuasive and insightful.
Organization & Structure
25 %
Does not Meet Standards
- Organization and structure detract from the concepts of the paper.
- Does not contain a thesis statement or sense of purpose.
- Concepts are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
Needs Improvement
- Structure of the submission is not easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.
- Concepts are disconnected.
- Lacks a sense of beginning, middle, and end.
Meets Standards
- Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
- Contains a thesis or clear expression of purpose.
-Effectively uses transitions.
- Has a sense of beginning, middle, and end.
Exceeds Standards
-Organization of the paper contributes to its persuasiveness.
- Purpose of the paper is clear.
- Paragraphs flow into each other due to skillful use of transitions.
- Has a clear sense of beginning, middle, and end.
Support
25 %
Does not Meet Standards
- Contains assertions that are not supported.
- Sweeping generalizations are provided without specific examples.
- Uses inappropriate or low-quality references.
- Insufficient references and citations.
Needs Improvement
- Insufficient support for assertions.
- Uses unconvincing examples.
- Contains logical fallacies.
- Lacks substance.
- Ineffectively uses references and citations.
Meets Standards
- Makes an effective case for the thesis or argument.
- Effectively uses appropriate references and citations.
- Support is provided for assertions.
Exceeds Standards
- Makes a convincing argument; fully supports thesis.
- Skillfully uses high quality references that are properly cited.
- Fully supports assertions and generalizations.
- Logically sound.
Technical- Mechanics & Style
25 %
Does not Meet Standards
- Paper contains distracting grammatical, punctuation, and/or spelling errors.
- Language uses excessive jargon or overly conversational tone.
- Paper is not written in APA style.
- Sentence structure is awkward or confusing.
Needs Improvement
- Paper contains some grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors that could be distracting.
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
- Includes errors of APA style.
- Succession of short sentences contribute to a choppy read.
- Contains unnecessarily long and complex sentences.
Meets Standards
- Free of distracting errors of grammar, usage, spelling, and punctuation.
- Language is clear; sentences display consistently varied structure.
- Correctly applies APA style.
Exceeds Standards
- Essentially free of typographical and errors of mechanics and style.
- Easy to read; clear and direct.
- Avoids jargon.
- Varies sentence structure.
- Demonstrates mastery of APA style.
Subjects:
Business
Political Science
(General)
Types:
Assignment
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Business rubrics
More Assignment rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.