Skip to main content

iRubric: Education Website Evaluation Rubric

(draft) edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Education Website Evaluation Rubric Education Website Evaluation Rubric Evaluation of Education Websites Rubric Code: HXW388C By Badebello Draft Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: (Other) Grade Levels: (none)

Website Evaluation Criteria
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Curriculum Content	Poor No relationship with curriculum content exists.	Fair Limited relationship with curriculum content.	Good Good relationship with curriculum content.	Excellent Direct relationship with curriculum content. X
Interactivity	Poor Lacks enhancements to actively involve the learner.	Fair Minimal enhancements to actively involve the learner.	Good Contains some enhancements to actively involve the learner.	Excellent Possess many enhancements that require learner to remain actively involved. X
Critical Thinking	Poor Student not given opportunity to engage in higher level thinking.	Fair Student given limited opportunities to engage in higher level thinking.	Good Student given some opportunity to engage in higher level thinking.	Excellent Student given extensive opportunities to engage in higher level thinking activities. X
Support Materials	Poor Support materials do not exist. Technical support is inadequate. Unable to track student progress.	Fair Limited options for assistance are given. Tracking student progress is available occasionally.	Good Assistance is available but not quickly accessible. Additional resources are available and student progress can be frequently checked. X	Excellent Assistance is readily available at any point in the website and many additional sources are available with ease of keeping track of student progress.
Classroom Environment	Poor No clear use of the website in regular classroom activities.	Fair Few lessons can be used in the classroom setting and there are few suggestions for use of the website for whole class, individual or group lessons.	Good Website can be integrated in classroom activities and there are suggested uses for whole class, individual and group lessons. X	Excellent All features can be used in classroom activities and the website includes activities for whole class, individual and group lessons.
Accessibility	Poor Graphics/links are not labelled or don't offer rollover labelling, fonts are difficult to read and content does not lend itself to varied learning styles and ability levels.	Fair Graphics/links are seldom labelled or seldom offer rollover labelling, fonts are sometimes used for ease of student reading and some content is accommodating to varied learning styles and ability levels.	Good Graphics/links are mostly labelled or have rollover labelling, fonts are mostly easy to read and most content supports varied learning styles and ability levels.	Excellent Graphics/links are labelled or have rollover labelling, fonts are consistently easy to read and varied learning styles and ability levels are accommodated. X
Age/Grade Level	Poor Directions, reading level, and product are inappropriate for targeted audience.	Fair Directions, reading level, and product are sometimes inappropriate for targeted audience.	Good Directions, reading level, and product are mostly appropriate for targeted audience.	Excellent Directions, reading level and product are appropriate for targeted audience. X
Assessment	Poor Assessment is unrelated or not available.	Fair Assessment does not engage learner and additional assessment is required.	Good Assessment is usually appropriate and can provide some measure of what has been learned.	Excellent Assessment is suited to goals and student ability and easily assesses what has been learned. X
Effectiveness in teaching	Poor Website is ineffective in teaching desired content. Interactivity is unrelated to learning, not directed at student enjoyment.	Fair Website is partially effective in teaching desired content, with limited interactivity and appeal to students.	Good Website is mostly effective in teaching desired content, with some interactivity that appeal to students.	Excellent Website is effective in teaching the desired content in an interactive way that students will enjoy while learning. X
Audience	Poor Website does not state academic levels and contains activities that are not suitable for target audience. Student diversity is not recognised.	Fair Website has limited activities suitable for target audience and partially recognizes that students learn in different ways.	Good The website is randomly states the academic level of target audience and activities are mostly suited for the ability level of target audience. It gives recognition to different ways of learning.	Excellent Clearly states the academic level of target audience and contains content and activities relevant to the audience. It recognizes that students learn in different ways. X

Keywords:

Interactive Learning Educational Website

Subjects:

Types:

(Other)

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Education rubrics

More (Other) rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202