Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Bioengineering Ethics Debate rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Bioengineering Ethics Debate
Bioengineering Ethics Debate
Rubric for evaluating student presentations. Can be applied to any presentation. Adopted from http://www.ncsu.edu/midlink/rub.pres.html
Rubric Code:
HXAW566
By
aabeardsley
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
(General)
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Debate Rubric
Excellent
4 pts
Good
3 pts
Fair
2 pts
Poor
1 pts
Scientific Evidence
Excellent
Evidence is presented, which is scientifically sound. Evidence has been cited. Evidence is not based on opinions or assumptions.
Good
Evidence is presented, which is scientifically sound. Evidence is not based on opinions or assumptions.
Fair
Evidence is presented, which is scientifically sound. Evidence may be partially based on opinions or assumptions.
Poor
Evidence is not presented, which is scientifically sound. Evidence is based on opinions or assumptions.
Thinking/Knowledge
Excellent
The student is well informed and presents their evidence with confidence and understanding. If applicable, the student can easily answer questions / refute points posed by the other team.
Good
The student is informed and presents their evidence with understanding. If applicable, the student can answer questions / refute points posed by the other team.
Fair
The student is somewhat informed and presents their evidence with a degree of understanding. If applicable, the student struggles to answer questions / refute points posed by the other team.
Poor
The student is not informed and presents their evidence with little understanding. If applicable, the student is unable to answer questions / refute points posed by the other team.
Time Usage
Excellent
Student has used their time well in class and is clearly prepared for the debate. During the debate, the student maximizes their time, not going over or under the designated time.
Good
Student has used their time in class and is prepared for the debate. During the debate, the student uses their time, possibly going slightly over or under the designated time.
Fair
Student has used their time in class but may have been distracted/ing and is only somewhat prepared for the debate. During the debate, the student does not use time well and is either significantly over or under.
Poor
Student did not use their time in class well and/or is not prepared for the debate. During the debate, the student does not use time well and is either significantly over or under.
Professionalism
Excellent
Student presents their arguments in professional language, and demonstrates respect and good-sportsmanship.
Good
Student presents arguments with mostly professional language. Sportsmanship and respect are evident.
Fair
Some unprofessional language is used and/or respect and sportsmanship is sometimes evident.
Poor
Significant unprofessional language is used, sportsmanship and respect need improvement.
Eye Contact and Elocution
Excellent
Student maintains eye contact with audience or opponent, and seldom returning to notes. Student uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear presentation.
Good
Student maintains eye contact most of the time but frequently returns to notes. Student's voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Most audience members can hear presentation.
Fair
Student occasionally uses eye contact, but still reads most of report. Student's voice is low. Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation.
Poor
Student reads all of report with no eye contact. Student mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for students in the back of class to hear.
Keywords:
Debate
Subjects:
(General)
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More (General) rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.