Skip to main content
iRubric: Bioengineering Ethics Debate rubric

iRubric: Bioengineering Ethics Debate rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Bioengineering Ethics Debate 
Bioengineering Ethics Debate
Rubric for evaluating student presentations. Can be applied to any presentation. Adopted from http://www.ncsu.edu/midlink/rub.pres.html
Rubric Code: HXAW566
By aabeardsley
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Debate Rubric
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Scientific Evidence

Excellent

Evidence is presented, which is scientifically sound. Evidence has been cited. Evidence is not based on opinions or assumptions.
Good

Evidence is presented, which is scientifically sound. Evidence is not based on opinions or assumptions.
Fair

Evidence is presented, which is scientifically sound. Evidence may be partially based on opinions or assumptions.
Poor

Evidence is not presented, which is scientifically sound. Evidence is based on opinions or assumptions.
Thinking/Knowledge

Excellent

The student is well informed and presents their evidence with confidence and understanding. If applicable, the student can easily answer questions / refute points posed by the other team.
Good

The student is informed and presents their evidence with understanding. If applicable, the student can answer questions / refute points posed by the other team.
Fair

The student is somewhat informed and presents their evidence with a degree of understanding. If applicable, the student struggles to answer questions / refute points posed by the other team.
Poor

The student is not informed and presents their evidence with little understanding. If applicable, the student is unable to answer questions / refute points posed by the other team.
Time Usage

Excellent

Student has used their time well in class and is clearly prepared for the debate. During the debate, the student maximizes their time, not going over or under the designated time.
Good

Student has used their time in class and is prepared for the debate. During the debate, the student uses their time, possibly going slightly over or under the designated time.
Fair

Student has used their time in class but may have been distracted/ing and is only somewhat prepared for the debate. During the debate, the student does not use time well and is either significantly over or under.
Poor

Student did not use their time in class well and/or is not prepared for the debate. During the debate, the student does not use time well and is either significantly over or under.
Professionalism

Excellent

Student presents their arguments in professional language, and demonstrates respect and good-sportsmanship.
Good

Student presents arguments with mostly professional language. Sportsmanship and respect are evident.
Fair

Some unprofessional language is used and/or respect and sportsmanship is sometimes evident.
Poor

Significant unprofessional language is used, sportsmanship and respect need improvement.
Eye Contact and Elocution

Excellent

Student maintains eye contact with audience or opponent, and seldom returning to notes. Student uses a clear voice and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear presentation.
Good

Student maintains eye contact most of the time but frequently returns to notes. Student's voice is clear. Student pronounces most words correctly. Most audience members can hear presentation.
Fair

Student occasionally uses eye contact, but still reads most of report. Student's voice is low. Student incorrectly pronounces terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation.
Poor

Student reads all of report with no eye contact. Student mumbles, incorrectly pronounces terms, and speaks too quietly for students in the back of class to hear.



Keywords:
  • Debate

Subjects:


Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60