Skip to main content
iRubric: BPSGT Drawing Portfolio rubric

iRubric: BPSGT Drawing Portfolio rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
BPSGT Drawing Portfolio 
BPSGT Drawing Portfolio
Students will keep a portfolio of building designs. There will need to be a minimum of 10 detailed building designs, 5 of which need to be replications of famous building and 5 of which can be their own creation. There will also need to be a minimum of 2 sets of floor plans in their portfolio. Detail will be very important.
Rubric Code: HCWA2W
By het1Bil
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: K-5, 6-8

Powered by iRubric Drawing Portfolio
  Exceeds Expectations

5 pts

Exemplary

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Unacceptable

1 pts

Did Not Complete

0 pts

Number of Drawings- Famous

Exceeds Expectations
Exemplary

At least 5 drawings of famous or well-known buildings
Good

At least 4 drawings of famous or well-known buildings
Fair

At least 3 drawings of famous or well-known buildings
Unacceptable

At least 2 drawings of famous or well-known buildings
Did Not Complete

Fewer than 2 drawing of famous or well-know buildings
Number of Drawings - Original Work

Exceeds Expectations
Exemplary

At least 5 original buildings of artist choice.
Good

At least 4 original buildings of artist choice.
Fair

At least 3 original buildings of artist choice.
Unacceptable

At least 2 original buildings of artist choice.
Did Not Complete

Fewer than 2 drawings of buildings of artist choice.
Detail in drawings

Exceeds Expectations
Exemplary

All buildings' architectural characteristics are obvious, bold and easy to see from a distance.
Good

Most buildings' architectural characteristics are obvious, bold and easy to see from a distance.
Fair

Some buildings' architectural characteristics are obvious. Some of the details are difficult to see at a distance
Unacceptable

The detail of architectural features in most of the drawings is difficult to see from a distance.
Did Not Complete

Few details are shown
Neatness

Exceeds Expectations
Exemplary

Erasure marks and smudges are minimal. Paper is not torn or folded. Obvious care has been taken to preserve the integrity.
Good

There are a few erasure marks or smudges, but they do not distract from the overall impact of the drawing. The paper is not folded or torn. Care has been taken to preserve the integrity of the drawings.
Fair

Several erasure marks appear on the drawings and/or there are several smudges on many drawings. Some drawings may have tears or are folded.
Unacceptable

Many erasure marks and smudges appear on the drawings and/or most of the papers have tears or folds.
Did Not Complete

Erasure, smudge marks, and tears distract from the drawings.
Presentation

Exceeds Expectations
Exemplary

Well rehearsed and appropriate voice level. Includes definitions of architectural features as student points to each feature.
Good

Prepared, but could benefit from rehearsal or voice projection. Includes definitions of architectural features as student points to each feature.
Fair

Poorly prepared and/or unable to identify architectural features.
Unacceptable

It is apparent that student did not rehearse the presentation prior to class.
Did Not Complete

Student chose not to present.
Labeling

Exceeds Expectations
Exemplary

The student has written/typed legibly & neatly the name of the famous buildings. The style of writing is either consistent with the time period OR consistent between drawings. There are no spelling or punctuation errors.
Good

The student has written/typed legibly and neatly the name of the famous buildings. There are 1-2 spelling errors and/or punctuation errors.
Fair

The student has written/typed some of the names of famous buildings, but they are not neat and/or there are 3-4 spelling or capitalization errors.
Unacceptable

The names of the buildings are missing or poorly displayed or illegible.
Did Not Complete

No labeling appears on the drawings.




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232