Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: BPSGT Drawing Portfolio rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
BPSGT Drawing Portfolio
BPSGT Drawing Portfolio
Students will keep a portfolio of building designs. There will need to be a minimum of 10 detailed building designs, 5 which need to be replications of famous building and 5 which can be their own creation. There will also need to be a minimum of 2 sets of floor plans in their portfolio. Detail will be very important.
Rubric Code:
HCW93C
By
sderrig
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Engineering
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
K-5
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Drawing Portfolio
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
5 pts
EXEMPLARY
4 pts
GOOD
3 pts
FAIR
2 pts
UNACCEPTABLE
1 pts
DID NOT COMPLETE
0 pts
Number of Drawings- Famous
DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY
At least 5 drawings of famous or well-known buildings
GOOD
At least 4 drawings of famous or well-known buildings
FAIR
At least 3 drawings of famous or well-known buildings
UNACCEPTABLE
At least 2 drawings of famous or well-known buildings
DID NOT COMPLETE
Fewer than 2 drawing of famous or well-know buildings
Number of Drawings - Original Work
DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY
At least 5 original buildings of artist choice.
GOOD
At least 4 original buildings of artist choice.
FAIR
At least 3 original buildings of artist choice.
UNACCEPTABLE
At least 2 original buildings of artist choice.
DID NOT COMPLETE
Fewer than 2 drawings of buildings of artist choice.
Detail in drawings
DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY
All buildings' architectural characteristics are obvious, bold and easy to see from a distance.
GOOD
Most buildings' architectural characteristics are obvious, bold and easy to see from a distance.
FAIR
Some buildings' architectural characteristics are obvious. Some of the details are difficult to see at a distance
UNACCEPTABLE
The detail of architectural features in most of the drawings is difficult to see from a distance.
DID NOT COMPLETE
Few details are shown
Labeling
DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY
The student has written/typed legibly & neatly the name of the famous buildings. The style of writing is either consistent with the time period OR consistent between drawings. There are no spelling or punctuation errors.
GOOD
The student has written/typed legibly and neatly the name of the famous buildings. There are 1-2 spelling errors and/or punctuation errors.
FAIR
The student has written/typed some of the names of famous buildings, but they are not neat and/or there are 3-4 spelling or capitalization errors.
UNACCEPTABLE
The names of the buildings are missing or poorly displayed or illegible.
DID NOT COMPLETE
No labeling appears on the drawings.
Neatness
DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY
Erasure marks and smudges are minimal. Paper is not torn or folded. Obvious care has been taken to preserve the integrity
GOOD
There are a few erasure marks or smudges, but they do not distract from the overall impact of the drawing. The paper is not folded or torn. Care has been taken to preserve the integrity of the drawings.
FAIR
Several erasure marks appear on the drawings and/or there are several smudges on many drawings. Some drawings may have tears or are folded.
UNACCEPTABLE
Many erasure marks and smudges appear on the drawings and/or most of the papers have tears or folds.
DID NOT COMPLETE
Erasure, smudge marks, and tears distract from the drawings.
Presentation
DUE WEEK OF
EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS
EXEMPLARY
Well rehearsed and appropriate voice level. Includes definitions of architectural features as student points to each feature.
GOOD
Prepared, but could benefit from rehearsal or voice projection. Includes definitions of architectural features as student points to each feature.
FAIR
Poorly prepared and/or unable to identify architectural features.
UNACCEPTABLE
It is apparent that student did not rehearse the presentation prior to class.
DID NOT COMPLETE
Student chose not to present.
Subjects:
Engineering
(General)
Types:
Project
Assessment
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Engineering rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.