Skip to main content
iRubric: Philosophy & Theology of Care rubric

iRubric: Philosophy & Theology of Care rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Philosophy & Theology of Care 
Philosophy & Theology of Care
Final Reflection Paper
Rubric Code: H5W83C
By erarmstrong
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Exceptional

5 pts

Good

4 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

2 pts

Substandard

1 pts

Content & Discussion

Personal theme(s) of one's own philosophy/theology
Exceptional

- Major ponts are very well supported.
- Purpose of the writing is clear.
Good

- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
Fair

- Major points are adequately stated and minimally supported
Poor

- Major points are addressed, but not well supported or discussed.
Substandard

- Content is incomplete.
- Major required topics are lacking or not all included or poorly discussed.
Integration

Personal reflection linked to course readings
Exceptional

Provided exceptional and thought provoking reflection on personal philosophy/theology of care and ample connection to course readings.
Good

Provided satisfactory reflection on personal philosophy/theology of care and ample connection to course readings.
Fair

Provided some reflection on personal philosophy/theology of care and minimal connection to course readings.
Poor

Provided minimal reflection on personal philosophy/theology of care with little to no connection to course readings.
Substandard

Provided no substantive reflection on personal philosophy/theology of care with no connection to course readings.
Organization & Structure

Identifiable introduction, discussion and conclusion
Exceptional

- Interesting and clear introduction previewing major points
- Full, substantive discussion of theme(s) within the body of the paper
- Strong paragraph transitions
- Conclusions strongly supported by body of the paper
Good

- Introduction previews major points
- Substantive discussion of theme(s) within
- Paragraph transitions are logical.
- Conclusions are supported in part by the body of the paper.
Fair

- Structure of the paper is clear
- Conclusions are not supported by the body of the paper
Poor

- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow
- Introduction does not preview all major points
- Paragraph transitions need improvement
- Conclusions are not clear
Substandard

- Structure detracts from the message of the writer
- Introduction and/or conclusion is missing
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling

Exceptional

- Paper contains no obvious errors in grammar, punctuation or spelling
Good

- Paper contains 1-2 grammatical, and a few punctuation and spelling errors
Fair

- Paper contains few grammatical, and a few punctuation and spelling errors
Poor

- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors
Substandard

- Paper contains grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors throughout






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232