4 pts
3 pts
2 pts
1 pts
Notes of what to look for
(N/A)
Have the assignments led to understanding by the students?
Have my attempts to engage students in discussion been productive and useful?
Have their been scaffolding, UD and MI adaptations for all students?
Was the pace too fast or slow?
These criteria should be separated. But this rubric doesn't subdivide further.
Not sure where to put this one, but contrary to Danielson do feel that it can be a valid indicator.