Skip to main content

iRubric: Online Discussion Assignment Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Online Discussion Assignment Rubric 
Online discussion assignments are worth 10 possible points
Rubric Code: H329C6
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Social Sciences  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Online Discussion Rubric
  Poor

2 pts

Fair

4 pts

Good

6 pts

Excellent

8 pts

Superior

10 pts

Assignment Responsiveness
17.5 %

Responsiveness to discussion assignment prompt.

Poor

50% or less of the prompt addressed in one or more postings
Fair

Up to 75% of the prompt components addressed in one or more postings
Good

Up to 90% of the prompt components addressed in one or more postings
Excellent

All components of discussion prompt addressed in multiple postings
Superior

All components of discussion prompt addressed in initial posting
Substance
17.5 %

Explores, explains, expands upon the issue being discussed. Uses text and experience to discuss subject matter. Demonstrate analysis on various levels other than the personal.

Poor

Postings reflect no evidence of assigned readings, no experience and no analysis.
Fair

Very unclear that readings were understood by incorporation into postings, little experience or analysis,
Good

Somewhat unclear that readings were understood by incorporation into postings, some experience and analysis explored.
Excellent

Somewhat clear that readings were understood by incorporation into postings
Superior

Very clear that readings were understood by incorporation into postings
Provocative
17.5 %

Promotes interaction and asks provocative questions.

Poor

No evidence that any other postings have been read/Unwitting repetition of questions or points made by others
Fair

One or more points from one or more participants only vaguely built upon/refuted in postings
Good

At least one point from one other participant clearly built upon/refuted in postings
Excellent

At least one point from multiple participants clearly built upon/refuted in postings
Superior

Multiple points from multiple participants clearly built upon/refuted in postings
Posting Timeliness
17.5 %

Timeliness of discussion contributions

Poor

Postings very concentrated during the week (i.e., all posted within a very brief period of time)
Fair

Postings somewhat concentrated during the week (i.e., all posted within a somewhat brief period of time)
Good

Postings neither distributed nor concentrated throughout the week
Excellent

Postings distributed throughout the week
Superior

Postings consistently and logically distributed throughout the week
Posting Quantity
15 %

Quantity of contributions

Poor

Replies only (regardless of number)
Fair

Original posting only
Good

Less than the minimum number of postings (original post and at least one reply)
Excellent

Met the minimum number of postings (original post and replies)
Superior

Exceeded the minimum number of postings (original post and replies)
Writing Mechanics
15 %

Adherence to academic spelling and grammar conventions.

Poor

7 or more spelling or grammar errors
Fair

Less than 7 spelling or grammar errors
Good

Less than 5 spelling or grammar errors
Excellent

Less than two spelling or grammar errors
Superior

No spelling or grammar errors



Keywords:
  • discussions online


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202