Skip to main content
iRubric: TIGER Rubric

iRubric: TIGER Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
TIGER Rubric 
TIGER is an acronym that helps you to easily remember the qualities that should be verified when participating in online discussions. It was created by Alvaro Galvis. It can be used with Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License.
Rubric Code: H28W68
By algalvis50
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate, Post Graduate

Powered by iRubric TIGER RUBRIC
TIGER is an acronym that helps you to easily remember the qualities that should be verified when participating in online discussions. This rubric can be used under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License
  Excellent

5 points total

1 pts

Good

4 or 3 points total

0.5 pts

Fair

1 or 2 points total

0.25 pts

Unacceptable

0 points total

0 pts

T - Title
1 pts

A short sentence that delivers the intention of the message and captures attention
Excellent

The title is suggestive and reflects the intention and content of the message. E.G. "Technology in education: pro and cons"
Good

The title relates to the content of the message but does not underscore the intention. E.G. "Technology in education"
Fair

There is a title but it is fairly related to the content. "My ideas on the topic"
Unacceptable

There is no title, or it is just the automatic RE:.. produced by the system
I - Illation
1 pts

Illation refers to building new ideas based on logical reasoning from what others have said, quoting and reasoning on their postings
Excellent

The message builds on prior messages threading ideas between them
Good

The message mentions prior messages but does not link them
Fair

The message mentions authors and ideas from other messages that were taken into consideration
Unacceptable

The message does not take into consideration prior messages
G - Generative
1 pts

G refers to generate more discussion, not for the sake of it but getting to the core of what is being discussed
Excellent

The intervention helps deepening the discussion, leaves new discussion seeds, provokes debate
Good

The message includes questions or arguments but they do not help deepening the discussion
Fair

The message includes questions but they are not open ended
Unacceptable

There are no new discussion seeds, or there are only pseudo-questions
E - Enriching
1 pts

E underscores the importance of stirring the discussion, of adding value to it.
Excellent

The intervention moves the discussion forward bringing new elements or perspectives into it
Good

The message focuses the discussion highlighting key elements of it
Fair

The message deals with the discussion thread but does not add value to it
Unacceptable

The intervention does not correspond to the discussion thread
R - Readable
1 pts

R highlights the importance of ensuring sentence quality for your message
Excellent

The message is well written and is presented in an easily readable format
Good

The intervention is well written but it is in a hard to read format
Fair

The message is understandable but it is not well written or presented
Unacceptable

The message is not understandable
TIGER postings
1 pts

Amount of postings that accomplish TIGER criteria
Excellent

Two or more postings are either TGER or TIGER
Good

Only one posting is TIGER
Fair

Only one posting is TGER
Unacceptable

None of the postings are TGER of TIGER



Keywords:
  • online dicussions, pragmatic dialogues

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n202