Skip to main content

iRubric: Student Council Application Rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Student Council Application Rubric 
Rubric Code: GX66242
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Assessment  
Grade Levels: 6-8, 9-12

Powered by iRubric BIBA
Students Council 2016/17
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Total

0 pts

Comment/Notes

0 pts

Overall Understanding

Excellent

Candidate knows the responsibilities associated with the position and clearly understands the commitment and responsibility needed.
Good

Candidates knows some about the position, commitment and responsibility needed.
Fair

Candidate knows little about the position and does not understand the commitment or responsibility needed.
Poor

Candidate knows nothing about the position and clearly does not understand the commitment or responsibility needed.
Total
Comment/Notes
Ideas and Organization

Excellent

It is obvious that the Candidate has put time and thought into his or her answers.
Good

The candidate has put some time and thought into his or her answers.
Fair

It seems as though the candidate has put close to no time or thought into his or her answers.
Poor

The candidate has put no time and thought into his or her answers.
Total
Comment/Notes
General Attitudes

Excellent

Candidate is energetic and is genuinely interested in the position.
Good

Candidate is passive and seems interested or is overly enthusiastic of the position.
Fair

Candidate is neutral and shows little enthusiasm in the position.
Poor

Candidate shows a lack of interest in the position.
Total
Comment/Notes
Quality

Excellent

Candidate's answers reflect outstanding professional depth and quality. Candidate will be a strong voice and leader for his or her position.
Good

Candidate's answers reflect adequate professional depth and quality. Candidate will most likely be a strong voice and leader for his or her position.
Fair

Candidate's answers reflect average depth and quality. Candidate will not likely be a strong voice and leader for his or her position.
Poor

Candidate's answers did not reflect depth or quality. Candidate will not be a strong voice or leader for his or her position.
Total
Comment/Notes
Overall

Excellent

Candidate would be an essential component to Student Council.
Good

Candidate would make a good student council executive.
Fair

Candidate would be a fair student council executive.
Poor

Candidate would be detrimental to the effectiveness of Student Council.
Total

Grand Total
Comment/Notes



Keywords:
  • Student Council Interview







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178