Skip to main content

iRubric: Instructional Plan rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Instructional Plan 
This rubric is used to assess all unit plans submitted to meet requirements of the Heritage University Teacher Education Programs. The format of the instructional plan adn the criteria of the rubric are based on those foudn in teh Washington Performance-based pedagogy Assessment used in student teaching.
Rubric Code: GX3535
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Enter rubric title
  Unacceptable

0 pts

Developing

1 pts

Adequate

2 pts

Distinguished

3 pts

Curriculum which facilitates learni

Unacceptable

•EALRs/GLEs not listed. •Learning target not defined or not defined in terms of student performance. •Learning experiences do not align well with EALR/GLE or learning target. •Lesson is inappropriate for grade level.
Developing

•Appropriate EALR/GLE is listed. •Learning target included, but vaguely defined or poorly aligned with EARL/GLE. •Learning experiences align only weakly with EALR/GLE or learning target. •Lesson is only somewhat appropriate for grade level.
Adequate

•Appropriate EALR/GLE is listed. •Learning target aligns with EALR/GLE, and clearly addresses performance and criteria. •Learning experiences are clearly outlined and align well with EALR/GLE and learning target. •Lesson will facilitate learning at the grade level.
Distinguished

•Appropriate EALR/GLE is listed. •Learnng target is clearly defined and aligns well with EALR/GLE. •Learning experiences are robust, clear and creative and align well with the EALR/GLE. •Lesson will motivate learning at the grade level.
Content Acurracy

Unacceptable

•Flaws in major concepts.
Developing

•Major concepts are accurate, but there are minor misunderstandings in content.
Adequate

•Lessons are conceptually accurate.
Distinguished

•Lessons are conceptually accurate and insightful.
Instructional Strategies

Unacceptable

•Range of strategies is very limited or one-dimensional. •No attempt to plan for inclusion of diverse learners. •Plan not tied to student experience or to another cultural experience.
Developing

•Strategies provide at least limited support for multiple ways of learning. •Plans for inclusion of diverse learners but in limited or superficial ways. •Plan connected with student experience or other cultural experience, but too general or shallow.
Adequate

•Strategies support multiple ways of learning. •Appropriate literacy strategies are applied. •Diverse learners are explicitly included in effective and appropriate ways. •Plan connected with student experience or other cultural experience, but too general or shallow.
Distinguished

•Strategies support multiple ways of learning. •Appropriate literacy strategies are applied consistently. •Diverse learners are explicityly included in effective and appropriate ways. •Plan clearly connected with students experience. •Plan includes diverse perspectives that are presneted in a way that is intentional and deep (e.g. presented from an insiders point of view).
Critical Thinking

Unacceptable

•No questions framed in instructional plan.
Developing

•Questions included in plan, but unclear or limited to eliciting yes/no responses.
Adequate

•Questions are clear, but limited to lower levels of Blooms taxanomy.
Distinguished

•Questions are clear and elicit the students understanding and promote critical thinking.
Assessment

Unacceptable

•Assessment is consistent with learning target and EALR/GLE. •Included methods of assessment are not appropriate. •Assessment is limited to one person.
Developing

•Assesment is only weakly related to learning target and EALR/GLE. •Methods of assessment are appropriate, but limited. •Assessment serves only 2 of 3 purposes.
Adequate

•Assesment relates strongly to learning target and EARL/GLE. •Multiple methods of assessment are applied as appropriate. •Assessment serves all 3 instructional purposes.
Distinguished

•Assessment relates strongly to learning target and EALR/GLE. •Multiple methods of assessment are applied as appropriate. •Assessment serves all 3 instructional purposes. •Assessment explicitly impacts instruction.
Organization, grammar, & mechanics

Unacceptable

•Major components are missing from the plan. •Components of the plan are unclear or illogical in their presentation. •Major and consistent flaws in grammar. •Frequent mistakes in the mechanics of writting. •Source not listed.
Developing

•Minor components missing from the plan or too limited in scope. •Components of the plan are somewhat unclear or disorganized, but a pattern can be discerned. •Flaws in grammar may be fairly frequent, but minor in nature. •Multiple errors in the mechanics of writting. •Source listed, but incomplete.
Adequate

•Components of plan are all present. •Components of plan are clearly and logically presented. •Few flaws in grammar. •Few flaws in the mechanics of writting. •Source listed, but flaws in APA format.
Distinguished

•Components of plan are all present. •Components of plan are clearly and logically presented. •No flaws in grammar. •No errors in the mechanics or writting. •Source is complete and presented in APA format.



Keywords:
  • Instructional Plan

Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202