Skip to main content
iRubric: OAD106 Group Project Rubrics

iRubric: OAD106 Group Project Rubrics

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
OAD106 Group Project Rubrics 
COM220 Project Rubrics
Grading for Event Planning Group Project
Rubric Code: G379WA
By ldesews
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  Outstanding

All criteria given are met. Work is thorough.

7 pts

Good

Most criteria are met. Work is quite thorough.

5 pts

Acceptable

Some criteria are not met. Work has some gaps that affect outcomes.

3 pts

Unacceptable

Many criteria are not met.

Work has noticeable gaps which will affect outcomes.

1 pts

Quality of Topics
10 pts

Ideas presented are appropriate and realistically
Outstanding

All ideas are possible and realistic for the scenario presented

Appropriate audience and content

Fully thought through
Good

Two of three ideas are possible and realistic for the scenario presented

Some appropriate audience and content

Missing some elements
Acceptable

One idea is possible and realistic for the scenario presented

Mostly appropriate audience and content

Mostly thought through
Unacceptable

Three ideas are not possible and realistic for the scenario presented

Not appropriate for audience and content

Not thought through
Format - Idea 1
2 pts

Follows format given in instructions
Outstanding

All of
-Title
-Content
-Format
-Speakers, equipment... needed
-Location
-Length
-Audience stated
-Within budget ($150)
Good

Most of:
Title
-Content
-Format
-Speakers, equipment... needed
-Location
-Length
-Audience stated
-Within budget ($150)
Acceptable

Some of:
Title
-Content
-Format
-Speakers, equipment... needed
-Location
-Length
-Audience stated
-Within budget ($150)
Unacceptable

Few of:
Title
-Content
-Format
-Speakers, equipment... needed
-Location
-Length
-Audience stated
-Within budget ($150)
Format - Idea 2
2 pts

Follows format given in instructions
Outstanding

All of
-Title
-Content
-Format
-Speakers, equipment... needed
-Location
-Length
-Audience stated
-Within budget ($150)
Good

Some of:
Title
-Content
-Format
-Speakers, equipment... needed
-Location
-Length
-Audience stated
-Within budget ($150)
Acceptable

Some of:
Title
-Content
-Format
-Speakers, equipment... needed
-Location
-Length
-Audience stated
-Within budget ($150)
Unacceptable

Few of:
Title
-Content
-Format
-Speakers, equipment... needed
-Location
-Length
-Audience stated
-Within budget ($150)
Format - Idea 3
2 pts

Follows format given in instructions
Outstanding

All of
-Title
-Content
-Format
-Speakers, equipment... needed
-Location
-Length
-Audience stated
-Within budget ($150)
Good

Some of:
Title
-Content
-Format
-Speakers, equipment... needed
-Location
-Length
-Audience stated
-Within budget ($150)
Acceptable

Some of:
Title
-Content
-Format
-Speakers, equipment... needed
-Location
-Length
-Audience stated
-Within budget ($150)
Unacceptable

Few of:
Title
-Content
-Format
-Speakers, equipment... needed
-Location
-Length
-Audience stated
-Within budget ($150)
Ideas Generated
3 pts

Twelve Ideas were included in report
Outstanding

Twelve ideas generated
Good
Acceptable
Unacceptable

Twelve ideas not included
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling
3 pts

Outstanding

Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.

No major errors.

Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Good

Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation followed with minor errors only.

Spelling is correct or would appear so to spellcheck tool.
Acceptable

Paper contains no more than three major grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.

Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Unacceptable

Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.

Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
Group Participation
3 pts

Effectiveness as a team member - number derived from evaluations submitted by entire group (individually)
Outstanding

Worked very well with everyone in the group

Participated and listened very well

Very flexible, made
others feel very good about themselves
Good

Worked well with most in the group

Participated and listened okay

Somewhat flexible, made some others feel good about themselves
Acceptable

Worked well with others in the group

Participated and listened well

Flexible, made
others feel good about themselves
Unacceptable

Had difficulty working with some group members

Participated and listened poorly

Not flexible, did not make some others feel good about themselves






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232