Skip to main content

iRubric: Financial Software Evaluation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Financial Software Evaluation Rubric Education Software Evaluation Rubric Evaluation of Financial Software Rubric Code: G2X2C75 By rkotecha Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Accounting Type: Project Grade Levels: (none)

Software Evaluation
	Excellent 10 pts	Good 8 pts	Fair 6 pts	Poor 5 pts	Comments (N/A)
Curriculum Content	Excellent Direct relationship with curriculum content. Content meets most to all goals and standards.	Good Good relationship with curriculum content. Content meets some goals and standards.	Fair Limited relationship with curriculum content. Content meets few goals or standards.	Poor No relationship with curriculum content exists. Content does not meet goals or standards	Comments
Interactivity	Excellent Possess many enhancements that require learner to remain actively involved.	Good Contains some enhancements to actively involve the learner.	Fair Minimal enhancements to actively involve the learner.	Poor Lacks enhancements to actively involve the learner.	Comments
Critical Thinking	Excellent Student given extensive opportunities to engage in higher level thinking activities.	Good Student given some opportunity to engage in higher level thinking.	Fair Student given limited opportunities to engage in higher level thinking.	Poor Student not given opportunity to engage in higher level thinking.	Comments
Support Materials	Excellent Assistance is readily available at any point in and many additional sources are available with ease of keeping track of student progress.	Good Assistance is available but not quickly accessible. Additional resources are available and student progress can be frequently checked.	Fair Limited options for assistance are given. Tracking student progress is available occasionally.	Poor Support materials do not exist. Technical support is inadequate. Unable to track student progress.	Comments
Accessibility	Excellent Graphics/links are labeled or have rollover labeling, fonts are consistently easy to read and varied learning styles and ability levels are accommodated.	Good Graphics/links are mostly labeled or have rollover labeling, fonts are mostly easy to read and most content supports varied learning styles and ability levels.	Fair Graphics/links are seldom labelled or seldom offer rollover labeling, fonts are sometimes used for ease of student reading and some content is accommodating to varied learning styles and ability levels.	Poor Graphics/links are not labeled or don't offer rollover labeling, fonts are difficult to read and content does not lend itself to varied learning styles and ability levels.	Comments
Age/Grade Level	Excellent Directions, reading level and product are appropriate for targeted audience.	Good Directions, reading level, and product are are mostly appropriate for targeted audience.	Fair Directions, reading level, and product are are sometimes inappropriate for targeted audience.	Poor Directions, reading level, and product are inappropriate for targeted audience.	Comments
Effectiveness of Software	Excellent Design is clear, easy to navigate, logical and provides an effective means to help students achieve.	Good Design is clear, but assistance is needed to navigate some areas. Technology is adequately utilized to be of benefit in the instructional process.	Fair Design lacks intuition and is difficult to navigate. Minimal effectiveness.	Poor Design is confusing and is not navigable. The technology does not provide any benefit.	Comments
Effectiveness in teaching	Excellent Final product is effective in teaching the desired content in an interactive way that students will enjoy while learning.	Good Final product is mostly effective in teaching desired content, with some interactivity that appeals to students.	Fair Final product is partially effective in teaching desired content, with limited interactivity and appeal to students.	Poor Final product is ineffective in teaching desired content. Interactivity is unrelated to learning, not directed at student enjoyment.	Comments

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Accounting rubrics

More Project rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202