Skip to main content

iRubric: ePortfolio Rubric - University of New England

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
ePortfolio Rubric - University of New England 
ePortfolio Rubric - University of New England
Rubric for assessing ePortfolios. University of New England MSEd program.......EDU 695
Rubric Code: G26ABW
By dcannan
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: ePortfolio  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric ePortfolio Rubric
  Excellent

Meets the Standard of Excellence

8 pts

Good

Approaches the Standard of Excellence

6 pts

Fair

Clearly Meets the Acceptable Standard

4 pts

Poor

Does Not Clearly Meet the Acceptable Standard

2 pts

Selection

Selection of Learning Samples
Excellent

-All artifacts and work samples are clearly and directly related to the purpose of the portfolio.

-A wide variety of learning samples are used
Good

-Most artifacts and work samples are related to the purpose of the portfolio

- A variety of learning samples are used.
Fair

-Some artifacts and work samples are related to the purpose.

-Some variety of learning samples are used
Poor

-All artifacts are unrelated to the purpose of the portfolio

-All learning samples are of the same genre
Reflections

Excellent

- All reflections clearly describe why artifacts in the portfolio demonstrate achievement of each standard / proposition and include goals for continued learning.
Good

- Most of the reflections describe why artifacts in the portfolio demonstrate achievement of each standard / proposition and include goals for future learning.
Fair

-Some reflections describe why artifacts in the portfolio demonstrate achievement of each standard / proposition and include goals for future learning.
Poor

No reflections describe why artifacts in the portfolio demonstrate achievement of each standard / proposition and do not include goals for future learning.
Rationale

Excellent

-All of the artifacts are accompanied that articulately explains the importance of that particular work, why the artifact was selected and its connectivity to the standards / proposition
Good

-Most of the artifacts are accompanied by a caption that articulately explains the importance of that particular work and why the artifact was selected and its connectivity to the standards / propositions
Fair

-Some of the artifacts are accompanied by a caption that articulately explains the importance of that particular work and why the artifact was selected and its connectivity to the standard / proposition
Poor

-None of the artifacts are accompanied by a caption that articulately explains the importance of that particular work and why the artifact was selected and its connectivity to the standard / proposition
Writing Mechanics

Excellent

-The writing demonstrates confident control of usage and mechanics

-The relative absence of errors is impressive considering the complexity of the response.
Good

-The writing demonstrates competent control of usage and mechanics

-Any errors do not reduce the clarity or interrupt the flow of the writing
Fair

The writing demonstrates general control of usage and mechanics

-Errors that are present may reduce the clarity or interrupt the flow of the response
Poor

-The writing demonstrates faltering control of usage and mechanics

-Errors reduce the clarity and interrupt the flow of the
Use of Multimedia

Video / sound work needs to be the student's work. Video & sound are required.
Excellent

-All of the photographs, graphics, sound and video enhance reflective statements, create interest, and are appropriate examples for one or more standards.
Good

- Most of the photographs, graphics, sound and video enhance reflective statements, create interest, and are appropriate examples for one or more standards.
Fair

-A few of the photographs, graphics, sound and/or video are inappropriate and no not enhance reflective statements or create interest, and are inappropriate examples for one or more standards.
Poor

-The photographs, graphics, sounds, and/or videos are inappropriate, do not enhance reflective statements, and are inappropriate examples for one or more standards or are distracting decorations that create a busy feeling and detract from the content.
Ease of Navigation

Excellent

-All of the portfolio navigation links and all sections (standards, artifacts, and reflections) connect back to the main table of contents.
-All external links to all connecting websites connect
Good

-Most of the portfolio navigation links and most sections (standards, artifacts, and reflections) connect back to the main table of contents.
-Most of the external links to connecting websites connect.
Fair

-Some of the portfolio navigation links and some sections (standards, artifacts, and reflections) connect back to the main table of contents, but in other places the links do not connect to preceding pages or to the original index page.
-Some of the external links to connecting websites do not connect.
Poor

-There are significant problems with portfolio navigation links and many sections (standards, artifacts, and reflections) do not connect back to the main table of contents or preceding pages or to the original index page.
-Many external links to connecting websites do not connect.
Layout and Text Elements

Excellent

-The eportfolio is easy to read with appropriate visual organization of information using fonts, point size, bullets, italics, bold, and indentations for headings and sub-headings. -The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately.
-The background and colors enhance the readability of text.
Good

-The eportfolio is generally easy to read with appropriate visual organization of information using fonts, point size, bullets, italics, bold, and indentations for headings and sub-headings. A few minor format changes would improve readers' accessibility to the content.
-The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately in most places.
-The background and colors enhance the readability of text in most places
Fair

-The eportfolio is often difficult to read due to inappropriate visual organization of information using fonts, point size, bullets, italics, bold, and indentations for headings and sub-headings. Some formatting tools are under- or over-utilized and decrease the readers' accessibility to the content.
-The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space inappropriately in some places. -The background and colors are distracting in some places and decrease the readability of text.
Poor

-The eportfolio is difficult to read due to inappropriate visual organization of information using fonts, point size, bullets, italics, bold, and indentations for headings and sub-headings. Many formatting tools are under- or over-utilized and decrease the readers' accessibility to the content.
-The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space inappropriately and the content appears cluttered.
-The background and colors are distracting and decrease the readability of text.



Keywords:
  • ePortfolio EDU 695



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n178