Skip to main content

iRubric: Writing Rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Writing Rubric 
This scoring rubric will be used on all writing assignments and is based on the Georgia Writing Assessment.
Rubric Code: G22AW3
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: English  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: (none)

Powered by iRubric Writing Assessment Rubric
  Outstanding

5 pts

Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Organization

Outstanding

Overall organizational strategy is appropriate to the writer's ideas and the purpose of the genre. Logical and appropriate sequencing of ideas with and across the paper. Introduction engages and set the stage, the conclusion gives a sense of closure. Logical groupings of ideas, and uses effective and varied transitional elements to link the parts of the paper, ideas, paragraphs and sentences.
Excellent

Overall organizational strategy is appropriate to the writer's ideas and purpose of the genre. logical sequencing of ideas across the paper, introduction sets the stage and conclusion ends the peice of writing without repetition. Related
Good

Overall organizational strategy is generally appropritate to the writer's ideas and purpose of the genre. clear sequence of ideas. Introduction and conclusion is clear. Related ideas generally grouped together. Transition link parts of the paper.
Fair

Organizing strategy is formulaic and/or inappropriate to the assigned genre. Minimal evidence of sequencing, may lack or have an ineffective introduction or conclusion. Unrelated ideas are grouped together, limited use of or repetitive transitions. Demonstration of competence limited.
Poor

No evidence of an organizing strategy, Unclear sequence of ideas, Lacks an introduction and/or conclusion. Ideas are not arranged in a meaningful order, or lacks transitions or inappropriate transitions and insufficient writing to determine competence in Organization.
Ideas

Outstanding

Fully developed controlling idea, consistant focus, supporting ideas are fully elaborated and relevant, response contain specific examples and details.
Excellent

Well developed controlling idea, consistant focus , Supporting ideas are relevant to writer's topic, respon contains specific examples and details.
Good

Developed controlling idea, generally consistant focus, most supporting ideas are relevant to topic, some parts of paper are well developed, other parts partially developed, response contains sufficient information to address topic
Fair

Minimally developed controlling idea, limited focus on assigned topic, supporting ideas are general or under developed, not enough information to give a sense of completeness, some what off topic.
Poor

May announce the topic but no controlling idea, little or no focus, story development is lacking due to brevity of the response, or not enough response to determine competence, majority of detail irrelevant to genre.
Style

Outstanding

Carefull crafted phrases or sentences create a sustained ton, varied, precise and engaging language, sustained attention to audience, consistent and appropriate voice, variety of sentence lengths, structures, and beginnings, a variety of genre strategies.
Excellent

Langauge and tone are consistent with writer's purpose, word choice is precise and engaging, attention to audience in whole paper, consistent voice, sentence vary lin length, and structure, some genre strategies.
Good

Language and tone are generally consistent, word choice is generally engaging, awareness of audience in whole paper, writer's voice is clear, some variation of sente length and structure, a few genre strategies.
Fair

Language and tone are uneven, word choice is simple, limited awareness of audience, minimal, inconsistant voice, little variaion in sentence length and structure, demonstration of competence limited.
Poor

Language and tone are flat, word choice is inaccruate, imprecise, or confusing, little or no attention to audience, no writer's voice, lack of sentence variety, insufficient writing to determine competence.
Conventions

Outstanding

Clear and correct variety of sentences, correct usage in variety of contexts, correct mechanics in a variety of contexts, errors do not interfere with meaning.
Excellent

a variety of sentences with correct end punctuation, correct usage with some variety but not all elements, correct mechanics with some variety, errors do not interfere with meaning.
Good

variety of sentences with some errors in compound and complex sentence, generally correct usage with some errors, generally correct mechanics with some errors, few errors interfere with meaning.
Fair

Sentence structure is awkward, ind punctuation may be missing, minimal control in 3 parts of conventions strong in 2, some errors may interfere with meaning, competence limited by the brevity of response.
Poor

Frequent sentence fragments, run-ons, and incrrect sentences, lacking end punctuation, frequent and severe errors in usage and mechanics, errors may interfere with meaning, insufficient writing to determine competence.










Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.

n202