Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Feedback Mechanisms Presentation Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Feedback Mechanisms Presentation Rubric
Class Presentation Rubric
This rubric is designed to assess a class presentation with a visual component.
Rubric Code:
FX69CA4
By
lrothen
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Biology
Type:
Presentation
Grade Levels:
9-12, Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Class Presentation Rubric
Beginning
1 pts
Developing
2 pts
Proficient
3 pts
Distinguished
4 pts
Information
Beginning
This presentation touches only on the very barest of detail. While generally about the topic, there is little to no specificity. There is a significant lack of evidence to support claims and/or there are major problems with inaccuracies. Significant omissions have been made.
Developing
This presentation hits the major points, but lacks detail. Information is too generalized to draw accurate conclusions. There is little evidence to support claims, and there are problems with accuracy. There are glaring omissions of information.
Proficient
While a generally good presentation, the information is less specific and less focused. There is some evidence to support claims, but support is less consistent than a 4. The information lacks some accuracy or specificity. Only small omissions of information are evident.
Distinguished
The presentation is focused and on-topic. Specific evidence is cited to support claims. Information is accurate, informative, and specific. All required pieces of information are included.
Quality of presentation
Beginning
It is apparent that there was little or no preparation. Presenters read from a screen or notes and are unable to discuss the topic. There is no evidence of collaboration. Presenters are unable to answer questions.
Developing
The presentation is too short and/or too confusing. Presenters offers little evidence to support claims, and there is little evidence to show true collaboration. Presenters read their presentation from the screen or from notes. One or more presenters has almost no role in presentation. Presenters are unable to answer several questions with any authority or accuracy.
Proficient
Presenters lack some evidence for claims, and there is less evidence of true collaboration and understanding. Presenters are less confident in presentation; some presenters do not have equal roles. Some questions go unanswered.
Distinguished
There is evidence of collaboration and of thorough understanding of topic. Presenters are knowledgable and confident in presentation. All presenters have a role in presentation. Presenters are able to answer questions.
Visual component
Beginning
Visual component is pieced together from other sources. There is no evidence of effort on the part of the presenters to create an interesting, accurate visual component. There are multiple errors in writing conventions.
Developing
Visual component is amateurish and vague. The component is not interesting and lacks large sections of information. The conventions of good writing are not observed, with major errors in grammar and mechanics evident.
Proficient
Visual component is less interesting, less accurate, or may have technical difficulties. While generally good, the visual component lacks some information. The conventions of good writing (grammar, mechanics, etc.) are observed, with only a few minor errors.
Distinguished
Visual component is interesting, accurate, and functional. Technical issues have been worked out before presentation. Visual component contains all relevant information. The conventions of good writing are observed with only minor errors.
Content
Beginning
Feedback loop, stimulus, signal, response are clear and detailed. Vocabulary is not explained for the audience. Little or no correct academic vocabulary used.
Developing
Feedback loop, or stimulus, and response are present. Some vocabulary is explained for the audience. Some correct academic vocabulary used.
Proficient
Feedback loop, stimulus, and response are clear. Vocabulary is explained for the audience. Mostly correct academic vocabulary used.
Distinguished
Feedback loop, stimulus, signal, response are clear and detailed. Vocabulary is explained for the audience. Correct academic vocabulary used.
Keywords:
presentation
Subjects:
Biology
(General)
Types:
Presentation
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Biology rubrics
More Presentation rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.