Skip to main content

iRubric: Education Software Evaluation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Education Software Evaluation Rubric Education Software Evaluation Rubric Evaluation of Education Software Rubric Code: F994BX By guess2426 Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: (Other) Grade Levels: (none)

Software Evaluation
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts	Total (N/A)
Curriculum Content	Poor No relationship with curriculum content exists. Content does not meet goals or standards	Fair Limited relationship with curriculum content. Content meets few goals or standards.	Good Good relationship with curriculum content. Content meets some goals and standards.	Excellent Direct relationship with curriculum content. Content meets most to all goals and standards.	Total
Interactivity	Poor Lacks enhancements to actively involve the learner.	Fair Minimal enhancements to actively involve the learner.	Good Contains some enhancements to actively involve the learner.	Excellent Possess many enhancements that require learner to remain actively involved.	Total
Critical Thinking	Poor Student not given opportunity to engage in higher level thinking.	Fair Student given limited opportunities to engage in higher level thinking.	Good Student given some opportunity to engage in higher level thinking.	Excellent Student given extensive opportunities to engage in higher level thinking activities.	Total
Classroom Environment	Poor No clear use of the software in regular classroom activities.	Fair Few lessons can be used in the classroom setting and there are few suggestions for use of the material for whole class, individual or group lessons.	Good Software can be integrated in classroom activities and there are suggested uses for whole class, individual and group lessons.	Excellent All features can be used in classroom activities and the material includes activities for whole class, individual and group lessons.	Total
Accessibility	Poor Graphics/links are not labeled or don't offer rollover labeling, fonts are difficult to read and content does not lend itself to varied learning styles and ability levels.	Fair Graphics/links are seldom labelled or seldom offer rollover labeling, fonts are sometimes used for ease of student reading and some content is accommodating to varied learning styles and ability levels.	Good Graphics/links are mostly labeled or have rollover labeling, fonts are mostly easy to read and most content supports varied learning styles and ability levels.	Excellent Graphics/links are labeled or have rollover labeling, fonts are consistently easy to read and varied learning styles and ability levels are accommodated.	Total
Age/Grade Level	Poor Directions, reading level, and product are inappropriate for targeted audience.	Fair Directions, reading level, and product are are sometimes inappropriate for targeted audience.	Good Directions, reading level, and product are are mostly appropriate for targeted audience.	Excellent Directions, reading level and product are appropriate for targeted audience.	Total
Effectiveness of Software	Poor Design is confusing and is not navigable. The technology does not provide any benefit.	Fair Design lacks intuition and is difficult to navigate. Minimal effectiveness.	Good Design is clear, but assistance is needed to navigate some areas. Technology is adequately utilized to be of benefit in the instructional process.	Excellent Design is clear, easy to navigate, logical and provides an effective means to help students achieve.	Total
Assessment Component	Poor Assessment is unrelated or not available.	Fair Assessment does not engage learner and additional assessment is required.	Good Assessment is usually appropriate and can provide some measure of what has been learned.	Excellent Assessment is suited to goals and student ability and easily assesses what has been learned.	Total
Effectiveness in teaching	Poor Software is ineffective in teaching desired content. Interactivity is unrelated to learning, not directed at student enjoyment.	Fair Software is partially effective in teaching desired content, with limited interactivity and appeal to students.	Good Software is mostly effective in teaching desired content, with some interactivity that appeals to students.	Excellent Software is effective in teaching the desired content in an interactive way that students will enjoy while learning.	Total
Speed	Poor Students advance at a much too slow or too fast pace. Speed is not based on individual needs	Fair Students advance at a slightly slow or fast rate. All students advance at the same speed.	Good Students advance at a moderate rate. Most students advance at the same speed.	Excellent Students advance at a speed that is appropriate to their individual learning needs	Total

Keywords:

lps, software evaluation, rubric, Lewiston, Maine

Subjects:

Types:

(Other)

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Education rubrics

More (Other) rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n178