Skip to main content
iRubric: Katie Flaherty Participation Self Grading Rubric Final Grade

iRubric: Katie Flaherty Participation Self Grading Rubric Final Grade

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Katie Flaherty Participation Self Grading Rubric Final Grade 
Katie Flaherty Participation Self Grading Rubric
Class participation is based on several important ideas: 1. We construct knowledge and learn from each other, and if you don't speak, others don't learn from you--and vice versa; 2. The evaluation of your performance is based on evidence, what can be demonstrated and observed-- you need to show what you know; 3. The more noticeable you make yourself by your participation, the more memorable you are to others when they are trying to recall who you are and what you stand for.
Rubric Code: F248525
By katieflaherty
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: (Other)  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Participation Criteria
  Poor = D

D: Set; Cannot be changed.

(N/A)

Fair = C

C: Set; Cannot be changed.

(N/A)

Good = B

B: Set; Cannot be changed.

(N/A)

My "A Game"

A: Criteria For Your "A Game". Must build on D,C, and B Criteria.

(N/A)

Evidence

At the end of the semester provide evidence to support your score for each category.

(N/A)

Attendance
20 %

Physically and Mentally Present for Class and Group Attendance.
Poor = D

Missed 3 or more classes and
and when present, was mentally absent typically demonstrated inattentive behaviors and used technology for non-class purposes. Never met with group
Fair = C

Missed 2 or more classes frequently demonstrated mental absence when physically present in class or was frequently observed using inattentive behaviors and/or repeatedly used technology for non-class purposes.
Good = B

Missed 1 or more classes rarely was only physically present and used personal electronic devices in service of creating a learning community.
My "A Game"

Did not miss any classes (unless for an illness or conflict) and if there was not class, met up with group to continue with the project.
Evidence

I was present at all in class meetings and outside of class meetings (unless I had a conflict and in that case I would make sure to notify my group members and keep up to date with the tasks at hand.) We even did a face time call one day during spring break to communicate and stay up to date on the project.
Listening and Questioning
20 %

Respectful, thoughtful,and attentive when participating and when others are speaking.
Poor = D

Never participates, other than when prompted or contributions are not pertinent or inconsiderate. Makes only statements, "(this is what you should do and how" Does not ask questions. Appears to be mentally absent when present in class, demonstrated inattentive behaviors, using technology for non-class reasons.
Fair = C

OCCASIONALLY and Irregularly participates, mostly when prompted. Occasionally used technology for non-class purposes.
Met with group occasionally and occasionally offered input to group discussion.
Good = B

Regularly Initiates open ended probing questions and comments without being prompted, adding pertinent, personal insight with references displaying understanding of the topic. Uses technology in service of creating a learning community.
My "A Game"

Is always listening when group members or other members of the class are speaking. Gives feedback on those ideas and asks questions if clarification is needed.
Evidence

In class I would listen about other group members projects and would listen when sharing about our annotated bibliographies. I would always participate in discussions within my group and would take down notes from the meetings and enter them into discussions.
Forum Participation
20 %

Poor = D

Posted 1-2 readings,personal experiences, news items, videos, articles, observations, etc
Posts show a below average/poor writing style and is difficult for readers to follow. Never responds to other posts.
Fair = C

Posted 3-4- readings, personal experiences, news items, videos, articles, observations, etc.
Posts do not demonstrate thoughtfulness and/or relevancy. Rarely responds to others. Responses are short without explanation or probing questions. Mostly, "I liked what you said" "Interesting post", etc.
Good = B

Posted 5-8 thoughtful readings, personal experiences, news items, videos, articles, observations, etc. Discussion posts are well written and clearly articulated. Creates interest and questions form others.Comment to others with explanation and/or probing questions.
My "A Game"

Actively using the forum (discussions) to stay on track with where the project is at. This includes weekly updates on who we have contacted, what stage of the project we are in, questions/concerns, where we are looking to go next, etc.
Evidence

Each week I posted to the discussions board with updates on our project. This included what we did that day in class, things we wanted to accomplish before next class, who we emailed, and questions we needed to get answered.
Presentations
20 %

Arguments, Analysis, and Original Ideas or Thoughts
Poor = D

Presentation demonstrates a minimal understanding of the assigned topic. Comments are general in nature and/or occasionally may not be relevant. Rehashes or summarizes ideas with limited analysis, original thought, and/or supported viewpoints.
Fair = C

Presentation mostly substantive and relevant to discussion topics, but often misses the big picture Ideas,; some original thought. Demonstrates logical thinking, reasoning, and/or analysis for most part. Viewpoint is supported with evidence and/or examples. Occasionally raises important issues and stimulates questions.
Good = B

Information presented is pertinent to topic and add important facts and perspectives. Ideas expressed include original thought,and substantial depth. Viewpoint shows strong logical thinking, reasoning, and analysis with evidence and examples. Construction of new knowledge meaning and insights are evident. Promotes participation /questions from others.
My "A Game"

Presentation displays a good understanding of the topics and ideas surrounding the project. The thought and ideas are presented logically. Open for comments and questioning/promotion of participation and interaction.
Evidence

Our presentation gave a good synopsis of what we completed. We gave a general over view of the guide we created and even printed out a more extensive version for people to refer to.Pictures were also included in the presentation to make it more appealing. I was able to answer questions and comment on the tasks we completed including what we planted in the pond, what animals live there, how long the whole process took, etc.
Team/Project Participation
20 %

Poor = D

Never participated in Team or Project activities.
Fair = C

Rarely participated in Team or Project activities, offered ideas and solutions.
Good = B

Usually participates in team meetings, initiates meetings with stake-holders, offers creative solutions to project challenges.
My "A Game"

Always activity participates in team and project activities, meetings,etc. and actively offers input to the project (unless could not be there due to illness)
Evidence

I very actively participated in group meetings and activities (see list on bridges)




Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n16