Skip to main content
iRubric: Symposium Paper rubric

iRubric: Symposium Paper rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Symposium Paper 
Paper will be graded on quality of research, effective use of information gained through research, credibility of sources, and relevance of included information. Grade will be based on organization, clarity, use of transitions, appropriate voice, correct citation format, grammar, spelling and punctuation.
Rubric Code: F235BB2
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric Symposium Presentation
100 %
  Below Basic Understanding

1

65 pts

Basic Understanding

2

75 pts

Proficient

4

85 pts

Advanced

6

95 pts

Quality of research
16.6 %

Below Basic Understanding

--1 or no sources cited
--Source reliability questionable.
--Little information relevant to topic.
--Minimal research.
Basic Understanding

--Failed to cite at least 2 sources
--Source reliability questionable.
--Some information relevant to topic.
--Information provided to support topic.
--Surface research.
Proficient

--Cited 4-5 sources
--Sources mostly reliable. Citation errors minor.
--Most information relevant to topic.
--Research of sufficient depth.
Advanced

--Cited 5-15 sources
--Sources reliable and properly cited.
--All information relevant to topic.
--Research in-depth and goes beyond the obvious, revealing new insights gained.
Exposition
16.6 %

Below Basic Understanding

--Topic unclear or non-existent. Unfocused introductory paragraph without thesis statement.
--Or, support for topic insufficient,
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and/or conclusion non-existent. Reader has a hard time remaining focused on the topic.
Basic Understanding

--Topic somewhat clear, with a slightly focused introductory paragraph and thesis statement.
--Support for topic barely sufficient, and/or.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Not enough information on the context or key words.
Little scholarly interaction.
Reader attention wanders more than average.
Proficient

--Topic stated clearly in an introductory paragraph with a succinct thesis statement.
--Research support for topic sufficient, but lacking in depth or complexity with few examples.
--Organization, transitions, introduction, and conclusion slightly lacking clarity and/or appropriateness.
Addresses a few key words.
Some interaction with scholars.
Addresses context.
Reader attention wanders a bit.
Advanced

--Topic is clear and focused, with a well organized introductory paragraph and succinct thesis statement.
--Research support for topic complex & complete, with developed ideas and examples.
--Writer involved with subject.
--Clear, appropriate organization, with effective transitions, introduction, and conclusion.
Key words, phrases analyzed.
Advanced presentation of context.
Considerable dialogue with Scholars.
Grammar and Mechanics
16.6 %

Below Basic Understanding

-- Voice inconsistent and/or inappropriate.
-- Ineffective word choice.
--Spelling errors.
--Many errors in agreement, pronouns, or tense.
-- Many errors in punctuation or capitalization errors.
Basic Understanding

-- Voice somewhat consistent and appropriate.
-- Correct word choice.
--Few spelling errors.
--Few errors in agreement, pronouns or tense.
-- Few punctuation or capitalization errors.
Proficient

-- Voice mostly consistent and appropriate.
-- Fairly effective word choice.
--No spelling errors, except those not detectable by spell-check.
--Fewer than 3 errors in agreement, pronouns or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
Advanced

--Consistent and appropriate voice.
-- Sophisticated and precise word choice.
--No spelling errors.
--No errors in agreement, pronouns or tense.
-- No punctuation or capitalization errors.
Development
16.6 %

Below Basic Understanding

--The presentation was too long or too short.
--The presenter did not speak clearly most of the time and established little eye contact with the audience.
Basic Understanding

--The presentation was the appropriate length but seemed very hurried or too slow.
--The presenter spoke clearly and distinctly only some of the time and/or established little eye contact with the audience.
Proficient

--The presentation was the appropriate length but seemed slightly hurried or too slow.
--The presenter spoke clearly most of the time and established eye contact with the audience.
Advanced

--The presentation was the appropriate length. It did not seem hurried or too slow.
--The presenter spoke clearly and distinctly and established eye contact with the audience.
Organization
16.6 %

Below Basic Understanding

--The information appears to be disorganized.
Basic Understanding

--Information is organized, but titles and subheadings are missing or do not help the reader understand.
Proficient

--nformation is organized with titles and subheadings.
Advanced

--Information is very organized with clear titles and subheadings.



Keywords:
  • Symposium paper - emphasis on process of paper writing


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60