iRubric: Pond Study Student Participation rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Pond Study Student Participation Pond Study Student Participation Evaluate each student's cooperative group skills and task performance and enter a rating for each group work responsibility. Circle the number that best fits their performance. Rubric Code: EXB5ACC By trhoads Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: (General) Type: Presentation Grade Levels: (none)

Evaluation
	Nada 0 pts	Poor 2.5 pts	Fair 5 pts	Good 7.5 pts	Excellent 10 pts
Participation	Nada Student did not participate.	Poor Hardly helped with activity.	Fair Somewhat helped with activity. Sometimes off task.	Good Helped with activity most of the time. Involved in the work most of the time; contributing member.	Excellent Helped with the entire activity. Took leadership role. Involved in group work all day.
Paper	Nada Student did not help with the writing of the paper.	Poor Hardly helped with the writing of the paper.	Fair Somewhat helped with the writing of the paper.	Good Mostly helped with the writing of the paper.	Excellent Extremely helpful with the writing of the paper.
Equity	Nada Student did nothing.	Poor Did hardly any work.	Fair Did some work.	Good Did a decent amount of work.	Excellent Did a lot of work,and was very helpful to other group members.
Take Responsibility	Nada Student did nothing.	Poor Does not perform any duties of assigned team role. Relies on others to do the work.	Fair Performs very little duties. Gives too little information.	Good Performs nearly all duties. Offers some information. Usually does the assigned work - rarely needs reminding.	Excellent Performs all duties of assigned team role. Offers a fair amount of important information. Does the assigned work without having to be reminded.
Equipment handling	Nada Student was irresponsible with equipment. Some pieces of equipment were broken.	Poor Student was careless with equipment but no damage. Equipment was returned uncleaned and unorganized.	Fair Student was mainly responsible with equipment, but returned it uncleaned or unorganized.	Good Student was adequately responsible with equipment and returned clean and organized.	Excellent Student was very responsible with equipment all day. Equipment was returned clean, in good shape and organized.