Skip to main content
iRubric: Internship MindMap Rubric

iRubric: Internship MindMap Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Internship MindMap Rubric 
MindMap Project Presentation Rubric
Rubric for evaluating student presentations. Can be applied to any presentation. Adopted from http://www.ncsu.edu/midlink/rub.pres.html
Rubric Code: DX268CB
By lvoyles
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Health  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: Graduate

Powered by iRubric MindMap Project Rubric
This rubric is used for all MindMap (MM) assignments MHI 584--see weekly assignment specifics for content criteria
  Excellent

Up to all total possible points

(N/A)

Good

Up to half of total possible points

(N/A)

Fair

Zero possible points

(N/A)

Organization and graphics

10% total points
Excellent

Content is well-organized. Multiple MindMap functions and options are used creatively and effectively.
Good

Content is organized but not well-sequenced. Limited MindMap functions and options used, or used ineffectively for impactful presentation.
Fair

Content is disorganized or missing. MindMap functions and options used poorly, ineffectively
Introduction/description of proect

10%
Excellent

Project introduction/
description is clear, logical and relevant to course content; is creative; catches the interest of the reader. Title topic location contains project title, student's name and year of presentation.
Good

Project introduction/
description is general, and vague; does not catch the interest of the reader. Title topic location contains some but not all required information.
Fair

Project introduction is disorganized; or relation to course concepts is not evident to the reader. Or this MindMap segment is not present. Title topic location contains little or none of the required information
Presentation quality

20%
Excellent

Presentation of information is clear, and demonstrates application of course content.
Good

Presentation is vaguely accurate, or unclear; shows limited evidence of understanding of course content
Fair

Presentation is not understandable; does not demonstrate application of course content.
Content specifics

30%

*See weekly assignment for specific criteria
Excellent

All required elements for this week’s assignment are presented and clearly understandable, logical.
Good

Most elements are present or all elements are present but insufficiently described
Fair

None of the elements are present and/or the elements are insufficiently described
Integration of references

15%
Excellent

At least:
Two (2) course text references and one (1) outside references integrated for each sub-section, with clear rationale.

Final MM has a separate Reference location with all map references in APA format
Good

Fewer than assigned references integrated, with limited rationale.


Final MindMap have a separate Reference location, but it is incomplete.
Fair

No references integrated into MindMap.



No separate Reference location on the final draft and/or the final MindMap
APA, grammar, etc.

15%
Excellent

Correct APA format, with only 1-2 grammatical and/or spelling errors. References cited and/or reference list with only 0-2 errors.
Final MM Executive Summary follows assignment criteria. Logical, creative.
Good

Very good attempt at APA format, with only 3-5 grammatical and/or spelling errors, References cited and/or reference list with only 3-4 errors
Fair

Poor attempt at APA format with more than 5 grammatical and/or spelling errors or APA format not used; grammatical & spelling errors great enough to confuse the meaning of sentence &/or paper, References not cited in body of paper, no reference list
MindMap points

Weeks 1-5 MindMaps: Points 10 ea (3 total)
Final: Points 20
Excellent

*See weekly assignment descriptions for specific criteria
Good
Fair



Keywords:
  • Presentation



Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n178