Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Compare/Contrast Poster rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Compare/Contrast Poster
Compare/Contrast Essay
Students are to compare and contrast hand drafting to AutoCAD or computer aided drafting.
Rubric Code:
DBB93A
By
nshoaee
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Engineering
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
C/C Poster
Excellent - 4
100 pts
Good - 3
75 pts
Fair - 2
50 pts
Poor - 1
25 pts
Comparison points
Excellent - 4
There are (4) four clear comparison examples between hand drafting and computer aided drafting.
Good - 3
There are (3) three comparison examples between hand drafting and computer aided drafting.
Fair - 2
There is (1) one comparison example between hand drafting and computer aided drafting.
Poor - 1
Student has not provided any comparison examples between hand drafting and computer aided drafting.
Contrasting points
Excellent - 4
There are (4) four clear contrasting examples between hand drafting and computer aided drafting.
Good - 3
There are (3) three clear contrasting examples between hand drafting and computer aided drafting.
Fair - 2
There is (1) one clear contrasting example between hand drafting and computer aided drafting.
Poor - 1
Student has not provided any contrasting examples between hand drafting and computer aided drafting.
Poster Structure
Excellent - 4
Student has included a title and distinction between the comparsions and contrasts. There is cohesion in the poster and all the points make sense. There are no (or very few) grammar mistakes, and they do not take away from the overall poster.
Good - 3
Poster reflects a title and some distinction between the comparisons and contrasts. Cohesion is mostly present throughout the poster. There are some grammar mistakes, but they do not take away from the overall poster.
Fair - 2
There is no title and no distinction between the comparsions and contrasts. There are some grammar mistakes, but they do not take away from the overall poster.
Poor - 1
There isn't any real form or format to the information of the poster. Grammar is poor and makes the information difficult to understand.
Poster Creativity
Excellent - 4
Poster shows creativity and is aesthetically pleasing.
Good - 3
Poster shows some creativty and is kind of aesthetically pleasing.
Fair - 2
Poster shows limtied creativity and is not really aesthetically pleasing.
Poor - 1
The poster shows no creativity and is not aesthetically pleasing.
Creativity of presentation/Intro
Excellent - 4
Original presentation and creativity shown in presentation, unlike anyone else in the class. Outstanding Introduction.
Good - 3
Original presentation and creativity shown in presentation. Good Introduction.
Fair - 2
Plain presentation, somewhat monotone speech, a little creativity shown in presentation. Small introduction.
Poor - 1
No originality/creativity shown in presentation. No Introduction.
Presentation Aesthetics
readability and flow
Excellent - 4
The presentation clearly renders knowledge of hand drafting and computer aided drafting. Poster is easy to follow while students is speaking and voice levels are great.
Good - 3
Much thought given to poster design and the presentation renders a great deal of knowledge on hand drafting and computer aided drafting. Student is flowing smoothly throughout.
Fair - 2
The presentation gives some knowledge of hand drafting and computer aided drafting. The poster is incomplete or hard to follow and/or it is difficult to see. Student is having some difficulty speaking.
Poor - 1
The presentation is incomplete or missing. There are multiple grammar errors while speaking.
Effectiveness of Presentation
Student engagement
Excellent - 4
Audience is engaged and have questions to ask.
Good - 3
Audience is engaged. No questions to ask.
Fair - 2
Audience is somewhat engaged but seem confused about the information being presented.
Poor - 1
Audience is not engaged or paying attention to the speaker.
Dress Attire (Business Casual
Excellent - 4
Dressed in Business Casual attire.
Good - 3
Dressed partically Business Casual attire.
Fair - 2
Dressed in Business Casual attire with inappropriate shoes.
Poor - 1
In appropriate school attire only.
Keywords:
Compare/Contrast Essay, Romeo and Juliet, Writing, Essays, English, Technology
Subjects:
Communication
Computers
Engineering
English
Journalism
Test Preparation
(General)
Types:
Project
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
ePortfolio
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Communication rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.