iRubric: Essay Question Evaluation rubric

Does not address prompt.
Major points are not clear and /or persuasive.

Does not adequately respond to prompt.
Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
Research is inadequate or does not address course concepts.

A solid paper, responding
appropriately to prompt. Clearly
states a thesis/central idea, but may
have minor issues in developments.
Makes solid connections between major course concepts and specific musical examples.
Attempts to define terms, not always
successfully.

Excels in responding to prompt. Demonstrates
nuanced thinking. Central
idea/thesis is clearly communicated;
Makes thoughtful connections between major course concepts and specific musical examples.
The author understands and critically evaluates
sources. Appropriately
defines and uses terms.

Paper lacks most elements of correct formatting.

Evidence supporting argument is severely lacking and/or is improperly cited.

Writer uses generalizations to support points. May use examples, but
they may be relevant.
Offers unsupported
opinions to make arguments. Lacks logic.
Some formatting guidelines are followed.

Uses evidence
effectively, but may have problems providing sufficient
evidence and explanation to
convince of major points.
Paper follows designated guidelines.
Most citations are correctly formatted.

Uses evidence appropriately and
effectively, providing sufficient
evidence and explanation to
convince. Follows guidelines; citations in correct format.