Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Final Paper Rubric - Modern Art History
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Final Paper Rubric - Modern Art History
Art History Research Paper Rubric
Rubric Code:
D7AB44
By
OtisCollege
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Arts and Design
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Criterion
Excellent
4.0 (A)
95%
95 pts
Very Good
3.0 (B)
85%
85 pts
Average
2.0 (C)
75%
75 pts
Poor
1.0 (D)
65%
65 pts
Unacceptable
0 (F)
10%
10 pts
Summary
Excellent
- Student demonstrates an outstanding ability to use research and course materials to gather details
- paper is coherent and well supported by referenced sources
- Clear and well integrated analysis
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
- Paper fulfills length requirements and succinctly covers the topic.
Very Good
- Student demonstrates an adequate ability to use research and course materials to gather details
- paper is coherent and supported by referenced sources
- Clear analysis
- Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
- Paper fulfills length requirements and succinctly covers the topic.
Average
- Student demonstrates a limited ability to use research and course materials to gather details
- paper is coherent and supported by referenced sources
- Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
- Paper is under required length and doesn't quite cover the topic.
OR
-Paper doesn't fully cover the chosen topic.
OR
-Paper is extremely excessive in length without extra content.
Poor
- Student demonstrates little or no ability to use research and course materials to gather details and shows little understanding of their research topic
- Paper is inadequate in length and doesn't cover the chosen topic.
-Paper is not double spaced
Unacceptable
- Student was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the paper.
- Unacceptable
- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Content
Excellent
- Content is comprehensive and accurate.
-Assignment questions/ comparisons/ topics were all addressed in an excellent manner.
-Integrated ideas from classwork, research, and questions
- Responses are excellent and address assignment including course concepts.
-Images of essential artworks discussed were included (citing sources of the images)
-Required number of comparison images were included (and sources cited)
Very Good
- Content is accurate and adequately comprehensive.
-Assignment questions/comparisons/ topics were all addressed well.
-Integrated some ideas from classwork, research, and questions
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
-Images of essential artworks discussed were included (with some source citings)
-Required number of comparison images were included (with some source citings)
Average
- Content is not fully comprehensive OR not accurate.
-Most of the assignment questions/comparisons/ topics/ were addressed.
-Integrated some ideas from classwork, research or questions.
- Responses are adequate and address assignment.
-Images of essential artworks discussed were included (but sources were not cited)
-Required number of comparison images were included, or some were included (but sources were not cited)
Poor
- Content is incomplete and/or not accurate.
-The assignment questions/ comparisons/ topics were not addressed adequately.
-Did not integrate ideas from classwork, research or questions.
- Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment.
-Images of essential artworks discussed were included (but sources were not cited)
-Required comparison images were not all included (and/or not cited)
-Illustrations are included but are not referenc
Unacceptable
- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the paper.
-Assignment questions/ comparisons/topics were not addressed.
-Images of essential artworks discussed were not included
-Required comparison images were not included
Research Details & Development
Excellent
-Found and incorporated excellent, relevant, and interesting details in researched sources.
- Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
Very Good
-Found and incorporated many relevant, interesting details in researched sources.
- Major points are stated and supported.
Average
-Found and incorporated details from researched sources.
- Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
Poor
-Mainly used information from the class, textbook, and personal opinion.
- Major points are not clear or persuasive.
Unacceptable
-Didn't include any detailed information
-Only used information from class or personal opinion.
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling
Excellent
- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Very Good
- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Average
- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Poor
- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
Unacceptable
- Unacceptable
- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Organization & Structure
Excellent
-Structure of the paper is clear and easy to follow.
-Thesis is clear and relates clearly to the content of the paper
- Paragraph transitions are logical and maintain the flow of thought throughout the paper.
- Conclusion is logical and flows from the body of the paper.
Very Good
- Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow.
-Thesis is clear and relates to content of the paper. Few
- Paragraph transitions are present.
- Conclusion is logical.
Average
- Structure of the paper is not easy to follow.
- Paragraph transitions need improvement.
- Conclusion is missing, or if provided, does not flow from the body of the paper.
Poor
- Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
- Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.
- Conclusion is missing.
Unacceptable
- Unacceptable
- No identifiable thesis.
- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment.
Research Sources and Citations
Excellent
- Included six or more scholarly sources.
-Consistently used MLA format correctly in Works Cited list.
-Consistently used MLA parenthetical citations correctly.
Very Good
- Included five scholarly sources.
-Usually used MLA format correctly in Works Cited list.
-Usually used MLA parenthetical citations correctly.
Average
- Included four scholarly sources.
-Used MLA format in Works Cited list
and
-Used MLA parenthetical citations
but had several errors
Poor
- Included three scholarly sources.
-Didn't use MLA format in Works Cited list
and/or
-Did't use MLA parenthetical citations
Unacceptable
-Included fewer than three scholarly sources
-Plagiarized from sources; copied sources without citing
-Didn't use MLA format in Works Cited list
and/or
-Didn't use MLA parenthetical citations
and/or
had serious errors
Submission
Excellent
- Assignment submitted on time
Very Good
- Assignment submitted on time
Average
- Assignment submitted on time
Poor
- Student failed to submit the assignment on time.
Unacceptable
- Student either did not submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the paper.
Subjects:
Accounting
Arts and Design
Biology
Business
Chemistry
Communication
Computers
Dance
Engineering
English
Finance
Foreign Languages
Geography
Geology
Health
History
Humanities
Journalism
Law
Math
Medical
Music
Philosophy
Physical Ed., Fitness
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Science
Social Sciences
(General)
Types:
Exam
Homework
Project
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Accounting rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.