iRubric: *Individual Presentation Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Individual Presentation Rubric Individual Presentation Rubric Rubric for evaluating student presentations. Can be applied to any presentation. Adopted from http://www.ncsu.edu/midlink/rub.pres.html Rubric Code: D22BA6X By rahcaba Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Social Sciences Type: Presentation Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Earth and Life Science 11 (Individual Reporting)
	Excellent 10 pts	Good 7 pts	Fair 5 pts	Poor 4 pts
Subject Knowledge	Excellent Student demonstrates full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration.	Good Student is at ease with expected answers to all questions, but fails to elaborate.	Fair Student is uncomfortable with information and is able to answer only rudimentary questions.	Poor Student does not have grasp of information; students cannot answer questions about subject.
Organization	Excellent Student presents information in logical, interesting sequence which audience can follow.	Good Student presents information in logical sequence which audience can follow.	Fair Audience has difficulty following presentation because student jumps around.	Poor Audience cannot understand presentation because there is no sequence of information.
Power point Presentation	Excellent Student's graphics explain and reinforce screen text and presentation.	Good Student's graphics relate to text and presentation.	Fair Student occasionally uses graphics that rarely support text and presentation.	Poor Student uses superfluous graphics or no graphics
Length	Excellent Presentation was within specified length.	Good Presentation was 5-10 minutes over or under specified length.	Fair Presentation was 11-15 minutes over or under specified length.	Poor Presentation was 16-20 minutes over or under specified length.
Voice	Excellent Student's voice was loud and clear. Information was easy to understand	Good Voice is good with minimal gaps in flow of information.	Fair Voice is acceptable - many gaps in flow of information or times voicecould not be understood by all.	Poor Student did not speak in a tone that could be heard by all students - too soft. Information too hard to understand.