Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Critical Thinking, Inquiry and Analysis VALUE Rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Critical Thinking, Inquiry and Analysis VALUE Rubric
Critical Thinking, Inquiry and Analysis VALUE Rubric
Use with final case based project
Rubric Code:
CXC983W
By
chase123
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Medical
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
Undergraduate, Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Critical Thinking VALUE Rubric
Exceptional
4 pts
Very Good
3 pts
Acceptable
2 pts
Unacceptable
1 pts
Explanation of issues
Exceptional
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated clearly and described comprehensively, delivering all relevant information necessary for full understanding.
Very Good
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated, described, and clarified so that understanding is not seriously impeded by omissions.
Acceptable
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated but description leaves some terms undefined, ambiguities unexplored, boundaries undetermined, and/or backgrounds unknown.
Unacceptable
Issue/problem to be considered critically is stated without clarification or description.
Existing Knowledge, Evidence, Resea
Exceptional
Synthesizes in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches. Viewpoints of experts are questioned thoroughly.
Very Good
Presents in-depth information from relevant sources representing various points of view/approaches. Viewpoints of experts are subject to questioning.
Acceptable
Presents information from relevant sources representing limited points of view/approaches. Viewpoints of experts are taken as mostly fact, with little questioning.
Unacceptable
Presents information from irrelevant sources representing limited points of view/approaches. Viewpoints of experts are taken as fact, without question.
Design Process
Exceptional
All elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are skillfully developed. Appropriate methodology or theoretical frameworks may be synthesized from across disciplines or from relevant subdisciplines.
Very Good
Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are appropriately developed, however, more subtle elements are ignored or unaccounted for.
Acceptable
Critical elements of the methodology or theoretical framework are missing, incorrectly developed, or unfocused.
Unacceptable
Inquiry design demonstrates a misunderstanding of the methodology or theoretical framework.
Analysis
Exceptional
Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
Very Good
Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
Acceptable
Organizes evidence, but organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.
Unacceptable
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
Conclusions and outcomes
Conclusions and related outcomes (implications and consequences)
Exceptional
Conclusions and related outcomes (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect student’s informed evaluation and ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.
Very Good
Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information, including opposing viewpoints; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are identified clearly.
Acceptable
Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion); some related outcomes (consequences and implications) are identified clearly.
Unacceptable
Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed; related outcomes (consequences and implications) are oversimplified.
Limitations and Implications
Exceptional
Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.
Very Good
Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.
Acceptable
Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.
Unacceptable
Presents limitations and implications, but they are possibly irrelevant and unsupported.
Keywords:
Critical thinking, Ambiguity, Assumptions, Context, Literal meaning, Metaphor
Subjects:
Medical
(General)
Types:
Project
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Medical rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.