Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Case Study Assignments rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Case Study Assignments
Case Study Assignments
Write a paper that discusses: 1. Summary of presenting issues 2. Clinically significant symptoms 3. DSM-V diagnoses that have criteria met from these symptoms; or the ones that are not met and what is missing from the symptoms presented (e.g. subclinical; rule-out; V codes) 4. Treatment plan & recommendations 5. Strengths/needs: client, family, school, peers, community (including developmental/environmental & cultural factors) 6. Assessment tools to use when assessing this client
Rubric Code:
CX3684B
By
springstons
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Psychology
Type:
Assignment
Grade Levels:
Graduate
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Case Study Assignments
Does Not Meet Standards
5 pts
Fair
10 pts
Good
15 pts
Excellent
20 pts
Summary and Background Info.
Does Not Meet Standards
- Content is incomplete; there is minimal information on the background of the character.<BR>
- Biographical information is non-existent or very unclear.<BR>
- Few to no examples are included.
Fair
- Biographical information is included, however lacks breadth and depth.<BR>
- Few categories are discussed or incorporated.
Good
- Biological information is clearly stated and accurate.<BR>
- There is some diversity in the areas of the character's life that are discussed.<BR>
-There are some examples relevant to the background information.
Excellent
- All relevant biographical information is clearly stated and accurate.<BR>
- Biographical information discusses a wide range of areas of the character's life including family, education, social support, financial status, and anything else that seems pertinent to that character's life history.<BR>
- There are ample examples to back up the background information from the movie/show/book, etc.
Clinically Significant Symptoms
Does Not Meet Standards
-Considerable difficulty identifying clinically significant symptoms and/or cannot discern what is significant and what is not.
- Very few or no symptoms are
Fair
-Omits clinically significant symptoms and/or identifies issues as clinically significant that are not.
- Some symptoms are included, with few examples.<BR>
Good
-Omits minimal clinically significant symptoms and/or identifies minimal issues as clinically significant that are not.
- The symptoms the character is experiencing are stated and backed up by some examples.<BR>
Excellent
-Accurately identifies clinically significant symptoms for this client.
- All symptoms the character is experiencing are stated and clearly explained with ample examples.<BR>
Symptoms & Diagnosis
Does Not Meet Standards
- The student does not display an understanding of the relationship between symptoms and diagnoses.<BR>
- A diagnosis is not present, or lacking in several aspects.
-No assessment tools are identified.
Fair
- Diagnostic ideas are present, but not well supported by symptoms or evidence.<BR>
- A diagnosis is present, but incomplete, incorrectly formatted, or lacking required information.
-Appropriate assessment tools for further investigation are not identified or are inaccurate.
Good
- Symptoms are organized into diagnoses. The student acknowledges that some symptoms did not fall into diagnoses.<BR>
- A diagnosis is present and and adequate.
-Appropriate assessment tools for further investigation are identified.
Excellent
- Symptoms are organized meaningfully into diagnoses. Symptoms that do not fall into diagnoses are explained as subclinical and what relevant diagnoses they could be classified under.<BR>
- A diagnosis is present, with all relevant codes and formatting, including psychosocial factors, medical factors, and cross-cutting symptoms.
-Appropriate assessment tools for further investigation are accurately identified.
Grammar, Punctuation, & Spelling
Does Not Meet Standards
- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.<BR>
- Language uses jargon, slang or conversational tone.<BR>
- Uses "I" or "me" throughout the paper
Fair
- There are some errors throughout the paper in punctuation, spelling, and/or language.<BR>
- Language is somewhat professional; some conversational tone or "I"/"me" is occasionally used.
Good
- Rules of grammar, and punctuation are followed with minor errors. Spelling is correct. <BR>
- Language is mostly professional<BR>
- Overall, the paper is comprehensive and easy to read.
Excellent
- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.<BR>
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.<BR>
- Professional language is used throughout the paper
Format
Does Not Meet Standards
- Paper lacks many elements of correct formatting.<BR>
- 3-4 page requirement is inadequate or excessive<BR>
- Paper is not in APA format.<BR>
- Format and/or flow make it difficult to follow the writing.
Fair
- Paper is about 3-4 pages.<BR>
- APA format has flaws, however, the general idea of how to format a paper in this structure comes across.<BR>
- Format and flow neither add to nor subtract from the readability of the paper.
Good
- Paper follows designated guidelines.<BR>
- Paper is 3-4 pages long.<BR>
- APA format is good, with few errors.<BR>
- Format and flow are good and deliberate.
Excellent
- Paper meets the 3-4 page requirement.<BR>
- Paper is in APA format, following all guidelines for structure, format, font, margins, and spacing.<BR>
-Format and flow between paragraphs enhances readability of paper.
Treatment Planning & Recommendation
Does Not Meet Standards
L/t goals and s/t objectives are not measurable and/or relevant to the identified problems. Interventions used are not relevant to the s/t objectives, and treatment recommendations within the continuum of care are not appropriate to the severity of client's symptoms.
Fair
Some l/t goals and s/t objectives are measurable and relevant to the identified problems. Some interventions used are relevant to the s/t objectives, and treatment recommendations within the continuum of care are somewhat appropriate to the severity of client's symptoms.
Good
Most l/t goals and s/t objectives are measurable and relevant to the identified problems. Most interventions used are relevant to the s/t objectives, and treatment recommendations within the continuum of care are mostly appropriate to the severity of client's symptoms.
Excellent
Includes measurable l/t goals and s/t objectives relevant to the identified problems. Includes interventions used that are relevant to the s/t objectives, and treatment recommendations within the continuum of care that are appropriate to the severity of client's symptoms.
Strengths/Needs, Systems
Does Not Meet Standards
Poor assessment of strengths/needs of client, family, peers, school, and community that does not include relevant cultural factors and developmental/environmental factors.
Fair
Mediocre assessment of strengths/needs of client, family, peers, school, and community that includes few relevant cultural factors and developmental/environmental factors.
Good
Assessment of strengths/needs of client, family, peers, school, and community may neglect a few relevant cultural factors and developmental/environmental factors.
Excellent
Thorough assessment of strengths/needs of client, family, peers, school, and community including relevant cultural factors and developmental/environmental factors.
Subjects:
Accounting
Arts and Design
Biology
Business
Chemistry
Communication
Computers
Dance
Engineering
English
Finance
Foreign Languages
Geography
Geology
Health
History
Humanities
Journalism
Law
Math
Medical
Music
Philosophy
Physical Ed., Fitness
Physics
Political Science
Psychology
Science
Social Sciences
(General)
Types:
Exam
Homework
Project
Presentation
Assignment
Writing
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Accounting rubrics
More Exam rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n60
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.