iRubric: Cooperative Learning rubric

• The team is unable to complete the assignment as a team.
• Some individuals do their portions, yet all do not contribute equally.
• The final product either does not get completed or part of the team does all of the work.
• Conceptual understanding cannot be assessed

• The task is completed, but is lacking in detail or evidence of thinking.
•Team has not gone beyond the minimum requirements of defining terms and/or displaying information.
• There is evidence that the team members have been able to take responsibility for their parts of the task, but there is varying quality of the individual parts.
• The success of a few has led to the team’s success, but not all members have contributed, learned, and/or performed equally.

• The team’s solution is complete and well written – all information is correct.
•Connections to prior learning are evident and all members can articulate what was learned.
• Quality of individuals is fairly consistent, contributing to a project that exceeds what one individual would do.
• There is evidence that the team members have been able to take responsibility for their parts of the task. They have supported each other and solved problems along the way

• The team’s solution is complete, detailed and well written and all information is correct.
• Organization and creative thinking are evidenced by such things as: original drawings, use of extended tools and technology and new questions raised for possible further study.
• The overall organization of the project extends the thinking of the audience.
• Team members did their jobs, but have redefined or extended them for a higher quality product or performance.