iRubric: Case Study Assignments rubric

- Content is incomplete; there is minimal information on the background of the character.<BR>
- Biographical information is non-existent or very unclear.<BR>
- Few to no examples are included.

- Biographical information is included, however lacks breadth and depth.<BR>
- Few categories are discussed or incorporated.

- Biological information is clearly stated and accurate.<BR>
- There is some diversity in the areas of the character's life that are discussed.<BR>
-There are some examples relevant to the background information.

- All relevant biographical information is clearly stated and accurate.<BR>
- Biographical information discusses a wide range of areas of the character's life including family, education, social support, financial status, and anything else that seems pertinent to that character's life history.<BR>
- There are ample examples to back up the background information from the movie/show/book, etc.

- The student does not display an understanding of the relationship between symptoms and diagnoses.<BR>
- A diagnosis is not present, or lacking in several aspects.
-No assessment tools are identified.

- Diagnostic ideas are present, but not well supported by symptoms or evidence.<BR>
- A diagnosis is present, but incomplete, incorrectly formatted, or lacking required information.
-Appropriate assessment tools for further investigation are not identified or are inaccurate.

- Symptoms are organized into diagnoses. The student acknowledges that some symptoms did not fall into diagnoses.<BR>
- A diagnosis is present and and adequate.
-Appropriate assessment tools for further investigation are identified.

- Symptoms are organized meaningfully into diagnoses. Symptoms that do not fall into diagnoses are explained as subclinical and what relevant diagnoses they could be classified under.<BR>
- A diagnosis is present, with all relevant codes and formatting, including psychosocial factors, medical factors, and cross-cutting symptoms.
-Appropriate assessment tools for further investigation are accurately identified.

- Paper lacks many elements of correct formatting.<BR>
- 3-4 page requirement is inadequate or excessive<BR>
- Paper is not in APA format.<BR>
- Format and/or flow make it difficult to follow the writing.

- Paper is about 3-4 pages.<BR>
- APA format has flaws, however, the general idea of how to format a paper in this structure comes across.<BR>
- Format and flow neither add to nor subtract from the readability of the paper.

- Paper follows designated guidelines.<BR>
- Paper is 3-4 pages long.<BR>
- APA format is good, with few errors.<BR>
- Format and flow are good and deliberate.

- Paper meets the 3-4 page requirement.<BR>
- Paper is in APA format, following all guidelines for structure, format, font, margins, and spacing.<BR>
-Format and flow between paragraphs enhances readability of paper.

Poor assessment of strengths/needs of client, family, peers, school, and community that does not include relevant cultural factors and developmental/environmental factors.

Mediocre assessment of strengths/needs of client, family, peers, school, and community that includes few relevant cultural factors and developmental/environmental factors.

Assessment of strengths/needs of client, family, peers, school, and community may neglect a few relevant cultural factors and developmental/environmental factors.

Thorough assessment of strengths/needs of client, family, peers, school, and community including relevant cultural factors and developmental/environmental factors.