Skip to main content
iRubric: Art History Research Paper Rubric

iRubric: Art History Research Paper Rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Art History Research Paper Rubric 
Art History Research Paper Rubric
Use this rubric for grading college Art History papers. Adapted from Pearson, MyArtsLab, Writing Space
Rubric Code: BX27835
By srimland
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Arts and Design  
Type: Writing  
Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Powered by iRubric Criterion
  A

90-100

5 pts

B

80-89

4 pts

C

70-79

3 pts

D

60-69

2 pts

F

0-59

1 pts

Development of Ideas
40 %

Is there a thesis statement? Does the paper provide a coherent argument/line of reasoning? Does the paper effectively use research to support the author's interpretation or analysis?
A

Makes a clear and and original thesis statement. Strong visual analysis in related works • Specifies and discusses observable details that support analysis • Correctly uses appropriate terminology to communicate ideas clearly and effectively • Synthesizes direct observation and research information to present an informed original interpretation
B

Thesis statement is clear. Analyzes some similarities and some differences in meaning based on points of comparison • Specifies observable details to support visual analysis • Correctly uses appropriate terminology to communicate ideas clearly and effectively • Synthesizes direct observation and research information to present an informed original interpretation
C

There is a thesis statement. Discusses some similarities and/or differences in meaning without much comparative analysis • Specifies some observable details, but lacks clear relationship to visual analysis • Uses some appropriate terminology, but does not effectively communicate ideas. • Combines direct observation and research information in discussion
D

Thesis statement is weak. The paper does not address the artwork. Incorrect or no use of appropriate terminology in discussion The paper does not combine direct observation and research.
F

-There is no thesis statement. No discussion of similarities and/or differences in meaning Specifies some observable details not related to visual analysis • Incorrect or no use of appropriate terminology in discussion • Repeats information from other sources
Focus and Analysis
30 %

The extent to which the document establishes and maintains a controlling idea or bottom line, and an understanding of purpose and audience, and applies visual analysis and terminology effectively.
A

Response persuasively justifies its conclusions through logic, examples, and illustrative language. References to art concepts and terminology, combined with skills of visual comparison and analysis, demonstrate a strong command of the subject.
B

Response justifies its conclusions through some combination of logic, examples, and illustrative language. References to art concepts and terminology, combined with skills of visual comparison and analysis, demonstrate a good command of the subject.
C

Response provides some justification for its conclusions. Some combination of logic, examples, and illustrative language are present but are inconsistent or somewhat ineffective. References to art concepts and terminology, combined with skills of visual comparison and analysis, demonstrate a partial understanding of the subject.
D

Response provides no significant justification for its conclusions. Logic, examples, and illustrative language are absent, inconsistent, and/or ineffective. References to art concepts and terminology, combined with skills of visual comparison and analysis, demonstrate a clear lack of understanding of the subject.
F

There is no conclusion, logic or examples. Visual analysis is absent or lacking. There is a lack of understanding of the subject.
Organization
15 %

Is the essay well structured? Does the organization enhance understanding? How well are transitions used? Are the introduction and conclusion clear?
A

Organization is effective and supports the logical flow of the response. • Transitions effectively connect concepts. • May contain an effective introduction and/or conclusion.
B

Organization is clear and appropriate. • Transitions appropriately connect concepts. • May contain an appropriate introduction and/or conclusion.
C

Organization is skeletal or otherwise limited, which may detract from the reader’s ability to follow the response. • Some simple or basic transitions are used, but they do not necessarily support the response. • May contain a minimal introduction and/or conclusion.
D

Organization is weak. Transitions are lacking. Introduction and Conclusion are lacking.
F

Response lacks a clear sense of direction. • No transitions. • Both the introduction and conclusion are absent.
Mechanics and Citations
15 %

Is the essay well-edited? Does the writer use a wide variety of conventions that enhance the text? How much do errors interfere with meaning? Is there a demonstration of scholarly research? Are sources cited?
A

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
MLA Format is correctly used. The paper is 8 pages long. There is a Works Cited page. Sources are appropriately cited. Images are clearly labelled.
B

- Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
- Language is clear; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
MLA Format is followed. The paper is at least 8 pages in length. There is a Works Cited page. Images are labelled.
C

- Paper contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.
- Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone. The paper uses some MLA format. The paper is less than 7 pages long. There is a Works Cited page but correct formatting is lacking. Images are included but not clearly labelled.
D

- Paper contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
- Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
MLA Format is inconsistent or lacking. There is no Works Cited page. Images are not clearly identified.
F

- Unacceptable
- Student either didn't submit the assignment or was unable to demonstrate enough knowledge to receive credit for the assignment. Paper is less than 5 pages.
Paper is plagiarized.






Discuss this rubric




Do more with this rubric:
Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.
Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.
Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.


Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60