Skip to main content

iRubric: Reflection paper rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Reflection paper Reflection paper This is a rubric designed to measure a student's reflection on a given theme. Identify your present thinking about technology after eight weeks of this course. What are the biggest challenges facing you concerning the future use of technologies within your environments? Describe your thoughts and connections concerning what you have learned during the first 8 weeks of this course. • What shifts have occurred in your initial thinking about technology and its relationship to learning? • What has surprised you the most from the readings and videos? • Do you feel you have a better understanding of technology’s role in society today and in the future? • Cover the following: o Background / History of the technology o Applications of the technology o Potential impacts of the technology o Pros / Cons of the technology Rubric Code: B6WC2A By sweetbrier Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Education Type: Writing Grade Levels: Graduate

Reflection Paper This rubric is designed to evaluate a student's reflection on a theme
	Poor A poor job of providing the required information is performed by the writer. 0 pts	Fair The assigned category needs work. 1 pts	Good There is a fair effort to do the reflection. 2.5 pts	Very Good The writer does a good job applying the category to the journal article. 4 pts	Excellent The writer completely covers all required information. 5 pts
Observance of submission guidelines 5 pts Is able to submit on time and follow the guidelines/mechanics on writing the paper (double-spaced, 1-inch margin, font standards, etc)	Poor Late submission and/or does not comply totally with any of the mechanics.	Fair Late submission and/or observes less than 50% of the guidelines.	Good Late submission and/or observes 75% of the guidelines.	Very Good Late submission and/or misses an item in the mechanics.	Excellent Submitted on time and follows all the mechanics in writing the paper. • APA 6th Edition formatting (DS, Time New Roman, MSWord format only) • Title Page • Table of Contents (Optional – use outline) • Documented Sources throughout the text (citations) • References/Bibliography of no less than 10 sources • Be no less than 5 pages in length and no more than 10 pages
Independent critical thinking 5 pts Uses logical and critical thinking in reflecting on theme and cited texts. Derives insights from texts/materials discussed in class.	Poor No exercise of independent critical thinking at all.	Fair Poor exercise of critical thinking.	Good There is an average effort for critical thinking/analysis.	Very Good One or more implications are given and are sufficiently clarified.	Excellent Implications are clearly explicated and demonstrate critical thinking skills
Citation of a related text 5 pts Relates text(s), and principles from class materials are properly cited.	Poor No attempt is made.	Fair Related text is irrelevant. (There are numerous grammar and spelling errors.)	Good The APA reference citation has more than one error as it is written.	Very Good The APA reference citation has one error. (There are some spelling and grammar errors throughout the paper)	Excellent No errors exist in the APA citation or in grammar and spelling.
Personal experiences 5 pts The writer shares a personal experience where she applies theories and where she manifests grasp of theories discussed in class.	Poor No personal experiences are given.	Fair Personal experiences are poorly developed in the reflection.	Good Effort to develop and reflect on personal experience(s) is just fair.	Very Good Personal experiences are clearly mentioned and expanded on.	Excellent The personal experiences of the writer are fully explained and related to the given theme or topic.
integration of ideas 5 pts Integrates the experience with related texts and insights derived from critical thinking.	Poor No attempt to relate the experience with texts/materials/insights.	Fair Very little attempt to integrate/synthesize (needs expounding)	Good Needs to improve more on integrating/synthesizing experiences and theological insights.	Very Good A very good attempt to integrate/synthesize experiences and insights.	Excellent Integrates personal experiences and insights very well, and comes up with deep theological insights, thus, whether progressive or prescriptive.

Keywords:

Grad, reflection

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Education rubrics

More Assignment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n178