iRubric: Case Study Grading Rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Case Study Grading Rubric Case Study Grading Rubric Rubric Code: B2294W9 By Esaete Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Business Type: Assessment Grade Levels: Undergraduate, Graduate

Criterion
	Substandard 0 pts	Poor 1 pts	Average 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Exceptional 4 pts
Analysis 35 %	Substandard No research or analysis was done.	Poor Minimal research was completed (example: sourcing information strictly from a single text).	Average A sufficient amount of data was provided although the argument is not fully supported - an critical factor to the argument hasn't been examined.	Good A comprehensive amount of information was provided, however, only information in support of the thesis is provided.	Exceptional All necessary research and analysis is provided in support of the paper's thesis. In addition, opposing views have been critically examined and demonstrated to be false or of minimal importance.
Organization & Structure 20 %	Substandard Structure detracts from the message of the writer. Paragraphs are disjointed and lack transition of thoughts.	Poor Structure of the paper is not easy to follow. Paragraph transitions need improvement.	Average Structure of the paper is clear.	Good Content was organized, but lacked headings. Paragraph transitions were logical.	Exceptional Content was organized in a clear and logical manner using headings. Paragraph transition was logical and made the paper easy to read.
Grammar, Punctuation & Spelling 10 %	Substandard Paper contains more than ten grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.	Poor Paper contains nine to ten grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.	Average Paper contains six to eight grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.	Good Paper contains three to five punctuation or grammatical errors.	Exceptional Paper contains less than one or two errors in grammar, punctuation or spelling. Language is clear and precise.
Content 35 %	Substandard Content was not presented in a clear and understandable manner. The required content was not included in the paper.	Poor Multiple components were missing from the content. It was not clear and understandable.	Average Two of the components of required content were missing, however, content was clear and understandable.	Good At least one of the required content components was missing. All content is clear and understandable.	Exceptional A description of the client and problem, as well as a brief overview of the literature researched is presented. The literature precedes the intervention plan. All content is clear and understandable.