Skip to main content

iRubric: Journal article Review rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Journal article Review Journal article Review This is a rubric designed to measure a student's reflection and application on an assigned evidenced-based journal article. Rubric Code: A79W8B By jheilfvccpta Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: (General) Type: Assignment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Journal Article Reflection This rubric is designed to evaluate a student's reflection on an assigned journal article.
	Poor A poor job of providing the required information is performed by the writer. 0 pts	Fair The assigned category needs work. 1 pts	Good The writer does a good job applying the category to the journal article. 2 pts	Excellent The writer completely covers all required information. 3 pts
Citation, journal and grammar. The reference citation is made using APTA guidelines. The article is current (published within the last 5 years) and comes from a peer-reviewed Physical Therapy journal. Good grammar and spelling are used throughout the summary.	Poor No attempt is made at referencing according to APTA guidelines. The article is neither current or from a peer-reviewed Physical Therapy journal. The writer's use of grammar is very poor and/or there are numerous spelling errors throughout the summary.	Fair The reference citation has more than one error as it is written. The article is not current or the journal is not peer-reviewed. There are numerous grammar and spelling errors throughout the summary.	Good The reference citation has one error. The article is both current and from a peer reviewed Physical Therapy journal. There are some spelling and grammar errors throughout the summary.	Excellent No errors exist in the citation. The article is both current and from a peer reviewed Physical Therapy journal. No errors exist in grammar or spelling.
Summary A brief summary of the article is included, identifying the author(s) key points.	Poor No summary is given. The author(s) key points are not identified.	Fair A summary of the article is attempted, but is severly lacking in more than one area. The author(s) key points are poorly identified.	Good A summary of the article is provided, but is lacking in one area. The author(s) key points are clearly identified but not well developed.	Excellent A brief summary of the article is given with all the required information. The author(s) key points are clearly identified and well developed.
Implications The reflection contains information on how this topic might apply to the physical therapy practice in general, &/or to the student's own professional practice.	Poor No implications are mentioned.	Fair One implication is mentioned, but is poorly developed in the reflection.	Good One or more implications are given and are sufficently clarified.	Excellent Implications are clearly explicated and student has thoughtfully demonstrated the integration of this new knowledge into the nursing profession.

Keywords:

Physical Therapist Assistant, journal summary

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More Education rubrics

More Reading rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n202