Skip to main content
iRubric: Group Work Evaluation rubric

iRubric: Group Work Evaluation rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Group Work Evaluation 
Evaluate cooperative group skills and task performance. Circle the number that best fits their performance.
Rubric Code: A5CA97
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: (General)  
Type: Project  
Grade Levels: 6-8

Powered by iRubric Evaluation
This is an evaluation on the group as a whole. The group's score is equal to the sum of it's members effort.
  NO Points

(students did little or no work in this category)

0 pts

Poor

1 pts

Fair

3 pts

Good

(average work expected)

5 pts

Excellent

(students went above what was asked)

6 pts

Project

How much each student helped with the creation of the project.

NO Points

Almost all students did not help with the creation of the project; only a few students are responsible for the finished project.
Poor

Members hardly helped the group with the creation of the project.
Fair

Members somewhat helped the group with the creation of the project.
Good

Most members contributed to the creation of the project.
Excellent

All members were extremely helpful with the creation of and finishing the project.
Equity

How much of the work each student completed.

NO Points

Students did nothing or only a few students are responsible for the finished project.
Poor

Most members did hardly any work; group assigned work poorly.
Fair

Most members did some work, yet not equal with other members; group did not assign work well.
Good

Members did a decent amount of work, at least equal to other members; work was assigned appropriately.
Excellent

Every member did a lot of work, and was very helpful to other group members. The work was spread out evenly and assigned appropriately.
Take Responsibility

How well the students did their part; how seriously they took their individual tasks.

NO Points

Students did nothing.
Poor

Most students did not perform any duties of assigned team role; relied on others to do the work.
Fair

A few students performed very little duties or gave too little information.
Good

Students performed all their duties and offered basic information.
Excellent

Students performed all duties of assigned team roles and offered a fair amount of important information.
Collaboration

How well the group shared and selected ideas.

NO Points

Students did not collaborate.
Poor

Students did not collaborate well; the group argumented and left out members.
Fair

Students attempted to discuss ideas and opinions; more argument than discussion, and some members were left out.
Good

Students dicussed ideas and opinions well; the group did not argue and involved all members.
Excellent

Students formed a hierarchy in which ideas and opinions were expressed, recieved, and voted on by members in an objective manner. Students worked towards the good of the whole group.
Time Management

How well the group spent their time; and what they spent their time on.

NO Points

Students wasted their time.
Poor

Students spent too much time on one task; or wasted time and threw together something to turn in.
Fair

Students managed their time poorly; did not allow enough time to be spent on each task.
Good

Students used time well; allowing enough time to be spent on each task.
Excellent

Students managed their time wisely; allowing for ample amounts of time to be spent on each task; did not spend too much time on each task.
Staying on Task

How well the students were able to focus on the task at hand; and moving from one task to the next.

NO Points

Students constantly needed to be reminded to stay on task and only worked while the teacher was working with them.
Poor

Students needed to be reminded to stay on task constantly; even during one task.
Fair

Students were able to stay on task with prompting from the teacher; had trouble moving from one task to the next.
Good

Students managed themselves well; needing little prompting from the teacher.
Excellent

Students managed themselves wisely; as tasks were completed they moved on to the next task without prompting from teacher.
Outcome

What students completed; how well students met the goals of the project.

NO Points

Students did not complete project.
Poor

Students did not complete most of the project; leaving out main parts and/or simple tasks; project is unfinished.
Fair

Students did not meet some goals for the project; the project is technically unfinished.
Good

Students met the goals for the project.
Excellent

Students met every goal for the project and added their own unique perspectives to the finished project.



Keywords:
  • group evaluation







Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n60