iRubric: Life Skills - Job Interview rubric

Student does not have the summary and/or the information provided is very poor demonstrating lack of interest. Appearance is messy and disorganized.
Formatting is inconsistent. Difficult to read.
(0-4 PTS.)

Summary provides basic information about the company but it does not show effort from student to learn important facts that may benefit him/her when applying for the job. Appearance is fair. Formatting is not all consistent. Typed with several spelling/grammar errors. Somewhat difficult to read.
(5-8 PTS.)

Summary is complete, well-written and demonstrates the student's interest in the job he/she is applying for. Formatting is consistent. Typed with minor spelling/grammar errors. Relatively easy to read.
(9-12 PTS.)

Summary is complete, well-written and demonstrates student's serious interest in the job he/she is applying for. Formatting is consistent. Typed with no spelling/ grammar errors.
Attractive/ eye-catching.Professional appearing.
(13-15 PTS.)

Many parts of the application left blank.
Information is accurate.
Many grammar and spelling errors.
Very messy.
(0-4 PTS.)

Most of the application is filled out.
All information is accurate.
Several spelling/ grammar errors.
Should be neater.
(5-9 PTS.)

Completely filled out. All information is accurate.
Minor spelling/ grammar errors.
Neatly done.
(10-15 PTS.)

Completely filled out.
All information is accurate.
No spelling/ grammar errors.
Very neatly done.
(16-20 PTS.)

The candidate finished the interview by leaving, and did not thoroughly answer final questions.
(0-3 PTS.)

The candidate finished the interview by politely thanking the interviewer. The candidate attempted to answer the post-interview questions.
(4-6 PTS.)

The candidate thanked the interviewer. The candidate did NOT express a desire to hear from the interviewer in the future. The candidate sincerely and thoughtfully answered the post-interview questions.
(7-8 PTS.)

The candidate thanked the interviewer, and appeared sincere. The candidate expressed a desire to hear from the interviewer in the future. The candidate sincerely and thoughtfully answered the post-interview questions.
(9-10 PTS.)

The documents are unorganized, dirty, wrinkled, do not have any order, quality of ink is poor, and student does not have recommendation letters.
(0 PTS)

Appearance is fair. There are some problems with the quality of the ink used (smudges). Student has one recommendation letter.
(1-4 PTS)

Documents are neat, clean, the quality of print is good. Student has two recommendation letters.

(5-8 PTS)

Overall presentation is outstanding. All documents are organized, clean, and have excellent print quality. Student has two recommendations letters.
(9-10 PTS)