Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Restaurant Project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Restaurant Project
Restaurant Project
Participating teams will demonstrate their knowledge of the restaurant and foodservice industry by developing a new restaurant concept and presenting to a panel of your peers.
Rubric Code:
B248565
By
shelbyglenn
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Business
Type:
Project
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Restaurant Project
Poor
3 pts
Fair
6 pts
Good
8 pts
Excellent
10 pts
Restaurant Name/type/theme and logo
Poor
Restaurant name/theme is not displayed neatly. The name and logo shows a bit of creativity. Theme/concept is not discussed
Fair
Restaurant name/theme is almost displayed neatly. The name and logo shows a bit of creativity. Theme/concept is discussed a bit
Good
Restaurant name/theme is somewhat displayed neatly. The name and logo shows some type of creativity. Theme/concept is somewhat discussed.
Excellent
Restaurant name/theme is displayed neatly and in a way that is attractive to the customer/investor. The name and logo shows creativity. Theme/concept is very clear.
Restaurant Design and menu
Poor
Menu does not have the required number of items. Pricing is not accurate for type of restaurant. The food does not match the theme/concept of the restaurant.
Fair
Menu has not enough or too many selections and they are not labeled correctly. Food in restaurant is not labeled correctly. Pricing a bit accurate for type.
The design is a bit clear.
Good
Menu has sections that are clearly labeled correctly. The food selections and descriptions are labeled. Pricing is somewhat accurate for type.
The design is somewhat clear and matches the concept/theme.
Excellent
Menu is creative and has sections that are clearly labeled correctly. The food selections and descriptions are labeled neatly. Pricing is accurate for type. The design is clear and matches the concept/theme.
Staffing needs
Poor
Staffing needs and salaries not accurately depicted for the restaurant type. Or not presented.
Fair
Some staffing needs and salaries somewhat depicted for the restaurant type.
Good
Most staffing needs and salaries somewhat depicted for the restaurant type.
Excellent
All staffing needs and salaries accurately depicted for the restaurant type.
Market Research
Poor
Market research including competition/demographics and target customer incomplete.
Fair
Some market research completed, including competition/demographics and target customer.
Good
Most market research completed, including competition/demographics and target customer.
Excellent
All market research completed, including competition/demographics and target customer.
Financing
Poor
Financing portion incomplete. Numbers missing.
Fair
Some financing completed. most numbers numbers incorrect
Good
Most financing completed. some numbers incorrect
Excellent
All financing completed and numbers are correct.
Including restaurant equipment, furniture, rent, sales, employees, and more.
Summary
Poor
Summary lists a few of their restaurant's features.
No explanation why restaurant will succeed.
Fair
Summary listed some of their restaurant's features.
Explains somewhat why restaurant will succeed
Good
Summary listed most of their restaurant features.
Explains in some detail why restaurant will succeed
Excellent
Summary listed all features of their restaurant. Fully explains in detail why restaurant will succeed
Work Ethic/presentation of project
Poor
No evidence of effort put forth by the students. Students did not work well together, time was not used wisely. Wasted too much time. Most of paper presented unprofessionally and sloppily.
0-9
Fair
Some evidence of effort set forth by student. Student some of the time worked well together and used their time wisely. Some of the paper presented somewhat professionally and neatly.
10-14
Good
Most evidence of effort set forth by student. Student most of the time worked well together and used their time wisely. Most of the paper presented somewhat professionally and neatly.
15-17 points
Excellent
Clear evidence of effort put forth by the student. Student worked well together and used time wisely. Paper presented professionally and neatly
18-20 points
Subjects:
Business
Foreign Languages
Types:
Project
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Business rubrics
More Project rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n16
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.