Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: AP Spanish Lit Question #4- Text Comparison rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
AP Spanish Lit Question #4- Text Comparison
AP Spanish Lit Question #4- Text Comparison
AP Spanish Literature Text Comparison
Rubric Code:
ZXXW5W6
By
juanitafa
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Foreign Languages
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Text Comparison
Demonstrates Superiority
5 pts
Demonstrates Competence
4 pts
Suggests Competence
3 pts
Suggests Lack of Competence
2 pts
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
1 pts
Literary Analysis
Demonstrates Superiority
Thoroughly analyzes a variety of rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in both works.
Demonstrates Competence
Explains and/or makes distinctions between rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in both works; description and narration are present but do not outweigh analysis.
Suggests Competence
Describes some rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in both works and attempts to explain their relevance; however, description and narration outweigh
Suggests Lack of Competence
Identifies some rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in one or both texts, but may not explain their relevance. Suggests a lack of understanding of the text.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
Identifies some rhetorical, stylistic, or structural features in the text, but does not explain their relevance. Demonstrates a lack of understanding of the text.
Thematic Development
Demonstrates Superiority
Response clearly analyzes the theme.
Demonstrates Competence
Response analyzes the them in both works.
Suggests Competence
Response explains the theme in both works.
Suggests Lack of Competence
Response attempts to explain the theme in both works.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
Demonstrates lack of understanding of the theme.
Thematic Comparison
Demonstrates Superiority
Compares the theme and the use of literary devices in both works.
Demonstrates Competence
Compares the theme and the literary devices in both works.
Suggests Competence
Attempts to compare the theme and literary devices in both works and/or the response has a significant unbalanced focus on one of the texts.
Suggests Lack of Competence
Response shows little ability to compare both works and/or treats only one text.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
No attempt to compare both works.
Textual Examples
Demonstrates Superiority
Supports analysis by integrating specific, well-chosen textual examples throughout the response.
Demonstrates Competence
Supports analysis by citing and discussing appropriate textual examples.
Suggests Competence
Elaborates on main points and supports observations by citing examples; however, the examples may not always be clear and relevant.
Suggests Lack of Competence
Presents main points and some details, describes basic elements of the text, but may do so without citing examples or supporting an argument.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
May consist entirely of summary or paraphrasing of the text without citing examples.
Organization
Demonstrates Superiority
Includes a statement of purpose (thesis), a coherent structure, and a cohesive and logical progression of ideas in a well-developed response.
Demonstrates Competence
Includes a statement of purpose (thesis), a coherent structure, and a logical progression of ideas.
Suggests Competence
Includes a statement of purpose (thesis), evidence of organization (a stated topic, an introduction, a conclusion), and a logical progression of ideas.
Suggests Lack of Competence
May not clearly state a purpose or be organized around a central idea or argument; progression of ideas may not be logical.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
Does not state a purpose, show evidence of organization, or offer a progression of ideas.
Balance and Focus
Demonstrates Superiority
Response has a clearly balanced focus that includes thematic analysis of both texts and literary devices.
Demonstrates Competence
Response has a reasonably balanced focus that includes analysis of both texts and literary devices.
Suggests Competence
Response attempts to have a balanced focus that includes analysis of both texts and literary devices. Contains some errors of interpretation, but errors do not detract from the overall quality of the essay.
Suggests Lack of Competence
Response has a significantly unbalanced focus on either of the texts and/or literary devices. Contains errors of interpretation that occasionally detract from the overall quality of the essay.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
Demonstrates lack of understanding and has a significantly unbalanced focus on either of the texts and/or literary devices. Contains frequent errors of interpretation that significantly detract from the overall quality of the essay.
Language Use- Vocabulary
Demonstrates Superiority
Vocabulary is varied and appropriate to the text(s) being discussed,
presents main ideas and supporting details, and communicates some
nuances of meaning.
Demonstrates Competence
Vocabulary is appropriate to the text(s) being discussed, and presents
main ideas and some supporting details.
Suggests Competence
Vocabulary is appropriate to the text(s) being discussed, but may be
limited to presenting some relevant ideas.
Suggests Lack of Competence
Vocabulary may be inappropriate to the text(s) being discussed, and
forces the reader to supply inferences.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
Vocabulary is insufficient and inappropriate to the text(s) being
discussed; errors render comprehension difficult.
Language Use- Grammar
Demonstrates Superiority
Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is very good; use
of verb tenses and moods is generally accurate; word order and
formation are accurate; use of cohesive devices and transitional
elements or both is appropriate to guide understanding.
Demonstrates Competence
Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is good; occasional
errors in the use of verb tenses and moods do not detract from
understanding; word order and formation are mostly accurate.
Suggests Competence
Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is adequate; errors in
the use of verb tenses and moods may be frequent but do not detract
from overall understanding; word order and formation are generally
accurate.
Suggests Lack of Competence
Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is weak; errors in
verb forms, word order, and formation are numerous and serious
enough to impede comprehension at times.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
Control of grammatical and syntactic structures is inadequate; errors
in verb forms, word order, and formation are nearly constant and
impede comprehension frequently.
Language Use- Writing Conventions
Demonstrates Superiority
Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation,
paragraphing) are generally accurate; paragraphing shows grouping
and progression of ideas.
Demonstrates Competence
Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation,
paragraphing) are generally accurate; occasional errors do not detract
from understanding; paragraphing shows grouping and progression
of ideas.
Suggests Competence
Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation,
paragraphing) are sometimes accurate; numerous errors do not
detract from overall understanding; paragraphing shows grouping
of ideas.
Suggests Lack of Competence
Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation,
paragraphing) are generally inaccurate; errors are numerous and
serious enough to impede comprehension at times; paragraphing may
not show grouping of ideas.
Demonstrates Lack of Competence
Writing conventions (e.g., spelling, accent marks, punctuation,
paragraphing) are inaccurate; errors are nearly constant and impede
comprehension frequently; there may be little or no evidence
of paragraphing.
Keywords:
spanish literature text analysis
Subjects:
Foreign Languages
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Foreign Languages rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n202
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.