Skip to main content

iRubric: JU_COUN 5551 1 F11 Discussion Board Responses rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
JU_COUN 5551 1 F11 Discussion Board Responses JU_COUN 5551 1 F11 Discussion Board Responses Threaded discussion rubric built in part around Bloom's digital taxonomy (http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/Rubrics+-+Bloom's+Digital+Taxonomy#toc0) and iRubric examples. Rubric Code: ZXXC92C By tchrrachel Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: English Type: Assessment Grade Levels: Undergraduate

Discussion Board Measurement Standards
	Exceeds Competency Effort at this level evidences some mastery of the material and is graded as "A-" or "A"graded as "A-" or "A" 10 pts	Meets Competency Effort at this level represents developmentally appropriate understanding of the material therefore graded in the "B" to "B+" range 8.6 pts	Below Competency Effort at this level is less than expected and is graded as "C- or below 5 pts
Moodle Post construction 10 pts (Up to 10 points)	Exceeds Competency Posts show insight, depth, & understanding. They connect with the topic and include references to supporting material when appropriate (e.g., URLs, files). Personal opinion is appropriately expressed & clearly related to the thread	Meets Competency Posts are somewhat simplistic but show some insight, depth, or connection to the key question. Some material may be irrelevant, but personal opinion is appropriately expressed & posts as a whole show understanding	Below Competency Simple posts that lack insight, depth, or are superficial. Entries tend to be short and frequently irrelevant to the key question. Does not express opinion clearly. Shows little understanding.
Moodle Reply construction 10 pts (Up to 10 points)	Exceeds Competency Replies show insight, depth, & understanding. They connect with the original post and add to that post by including references to supporting material when appropriate (e.g., URLs, files). Personal opinion is appropriately expressed & clearly related to original post.	Meets Competency Replies are simple but show moderate insight, depth, or connection to the original post. Some material may be irrelevant, but personal opinion is appropriately expressed & posts as a whole show understanding.	Below Competency Simple replies that lack insight, depth, or are superficial. Entries tend to be short and frequently irrelevant to the key question. Does not express opinion clearly. Shows little understanding.
Evaluation: Critique 10 pts (Up to 10 points)	Exceeds Competency Provides, in an appropriate manner, constructive criticism of other posts/replies that should be of considerable help to the original author.	Meets Competency Provides, in an appropriate manner, constructive criticism of other posts/replies that should be of considerable help to the original author.	Below Competency Little or no effort appears to be made to provide constructive criticism of other posts or replies.
Evaluation: Questions 5 pts (Up to 5 points)	Exceeds Competency Poses/replies to especially focused or challenging questions in a way showing significant understanding of the topic and a good ability to defend one's position.	Meets Competency Poses/replies to especially focused or challenging questions in a way showing significant understanding of the topic and a good ability to defend one's position.	Below Competency Little or no effort appears to be made to pose appropriate questions or to respond to questions posed by others.
Community Contribution 10 pts (Up to 10 points)	Exceeds Competency Consistently provides leadership and creativity by engaging and encouraging the learning community. Provides and appropriate level of opinion and personal disclosure.	Meets Competency Some attempts at directing discussion or presenting viewpoints that encourages group involvement.	Below Competency Little or no effort is made to participate in the development of the community.
Grammar/Mechanics 5 pts (Up to 5 points)	Exceeds Competency Posts/replies consistently show good grammar, have few or no spelling errors, and are presented in a structure/format that enhances readability.	Meets Competency Posts/replies have few spelling and grammatical errors. Text construction is clear with few abbreviations or txt style language.	Below Competency Poor spelling and grammatical errors in multiple posts/replies. Written in language that is unclear or difficult to comprehend, using frequent abbreviations or txt

Keywords:

Bloom's taxonomy, online discussion board, threaded discussion

Subjects:

Types:

Discuss this rubric

You may also be interested in:

More rubrics by this author

More English rubrics

More Assessment rubrics

Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.

Print

Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.

Assess

Test run

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.

Share

Publish

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubric^tm.

n178