Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Frankenstein Final Assessment rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Frankenstein Final Assessment
Crime and Punishment Passage-Based Response
Rubric Code:
ZXB4724
By
kjmannion
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
English
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Crime and Punishment Responses
Undeveloped
1 pts
Developing
2 pts
Developed
3 pts
Well-Developed
4 pts
Thought Piece - Content & Style
Undeveloped
No clear claim.
Little attempt to analyze textual specifics OR
analysis reveals a lack of textual understanding.
May not reference the final chapter.
***********
Accumulation of careless errors - in need of proofreading.
Developing
Attempts a claim, but this is more of a factual statement.
Analysis is superficial or overly general OR analysis rests on a misreading of specific evidence.
May not reference the final chapter.
**********
Phrasing may be unclear or imprecise at times.
Errors sometimes blur meaning.
Developed
Supports an assertive claim with reasonable analysis of relevant details, including language and lit. techniques, but some of this analysis could be more insightful.
References the final chapter.
*************
Writing is clear throughout.
Generally expresses ideas with precision.
May contain one or two errors in conventions or usage, but these do not cause confusion.
Well-Developed
Supports an assertive claim with compelling analysis of well-chosen details, including specific language and literary techniques.
References the final chapter.
Shows originality / insight.
******************
Writing is clear, articulate, and fluent throughout.
Expresses complex ideas with precision.
Minimal to no errors
Fishbowl Discussion
Undeveloped
Comments are overly general, reflecting a lack of textual knowledge.
Doesn't engage with others' ideas, and may not seem particularly attentive.
Developing
Makes basically correct but superficial points, or tries to analyze specifics, but misreads the text.
Attentive to others while they're talking, but may not engage much with others' ideas, sticking to the "script" of ideas / comments prepared in advance.
Developed
Makes valid, reasonable points with evidence, but this evidence may be less specific or analysis may be less insightful.
Engages with others' ideas, but in a less precise or nuanced way.
Ex) "To piggyback on what ___ said, __________________."
Well-Developed
Makes insightful, persuasive points with specific support rooted in the analysis of well-chosen textual details.
Builds on challenges, or complicates ideas of others with specific reasoning:
Ex) "I think ___ was right about ______, but I"m not so sure about ______, because _______."
-May ask helpful questions to seek clarification or move discussion forward.
Full-Class Seminar
Undeveloped
Comments are overly general, reflecting a lack of textual knowledge.
Doesn't engage with others' ideas, and may not seem particularly attentive.
Developing
Makes basically correct but superficial points, or tries to analyze specifics, but misreads the text.
Attentive to others while they're talking, but may not engage much with others' ideas, sticking to the "script" of ideas / comments prepared in advance.
Developed
Makes valid, reasonable points with evidence, but this evidence may be less specific or analysis may be less insightful.
Engages with others' ideas, but in a less precise or nuanced way.
Ex) "To piggyback on what ___ said, __________________."
Well-Developed
Makes insightful, persuasive points with specific support rooted in the analysis of well-chosen textual details.
Builds on challenges, or complicates ideas of others with specific reasoning:
Ex) "I think ___ was right about ______, but I"m not so sure about ______, because _______."
-May ask helpful questions to seek clarification or move discussion forward.
Final Writing Piece
Undeveloped
May not get at the question of overall meaning.
May not refute a counterclaim.
May not discuss how chosen quotation "unlocks" meaning.
Accumulation of careless errors - in need of proofreading.
Developing
Articulates a reasonable reading of the novel as a whole, but the supporting analysis may be overly general or superficial.
May not refute a counterclaim.
Talks about how the chosen quotation "unlocks" the novel's meaning, but may not dig into language or lit. techniques.
Some grammatical or usage errors may blur meaning / cause confusion.
Developed
Articulates a reasonable reading of the novel as a whole, supported by the analysis of well-chosen textual specifics.
Refutes a counterclaim.
Analyzes how the language / lit. techniques of a chosen quotation "unlocks" the novel's meaning.
A few errors, but none that interfere with meaning.
Well-Developed
Articulates a nuanced, insightful reading of the novel as a whole, supported by the analysis of well-chosen textual specifics.
Refutes a counterclaim.
Masterfully analyzes how the language / lit. techniques of a chosen quotation "unlocks" the novel's meaning.
Ideas feel fresh / original.
Phrasing is clear, articulate and fluent throughout with minimal to no errors.
Subjects:
English
Types:
Writing
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More English rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n178
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.