Skip to main content
sign in
Username
Password
forgot?
Sign up
Share
help_outline
help
Pricing
Request Info
Please enable JavaScript on your web browser
menu
iRubric: Greek Gods Research Project rubric
find rubric
Your browser does not support iframes.
edit
print
share
Copy to my rubrics
Bookmark
test run
assess...
delete
Do more...
Greek Gods Research Project
Seneca High School Research Project
Rubric Code:
ZX4W4A2
By
cunninsl
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject:
Humanities
Type:
Writing
Grade Levels:
9-12
Your browser does not support iframes.
Desktop Mode
Mobile Mode
Reasearch Project
Poor
1 pts
Fair
2 pts
Good
3 pts
Excellent
4 pts
Outstanding
5 pts
Introduction
Poor
Questions are taken directly from the assignment sheet and introduction shows very little creativity.
Fair
Questions are taken fromt he assignment sheet and are used as a base for own questions.
Good
Focused questions are posed that yield relevant information in a specific area.
Excellent
Careful, focused questions are posed that yield logical and relevant information in a specific area.
Outstanding
Thoughtful, creative questions are posed that contribute to knowledge in a specific area.
Organization
Poor
Information is disorganized.
Gaps in content or repeated content.
Reader confused.
Fair
2 or 3 problems with organization of information.
Separate ideas are not discussed in separate paragraphs.
Reader must reread at times for clarity.
Good
Information is generally organized with only 1 or 2 problems.
Separate ideas discussed in separate paragraphs.
Reader finds content generally clear.
Excellent
Information is organized with well constructed paragraphs.
Content flows nicely.
Reader finds content clear and easy to follow.
Outstanding
Information is very organized with well constructed paragraphs.
Content follows a logical sequence.
Reader finds content easy to find, clear and logical.
Quality of Information
Poor
Information has little to do with questions posed in the introduction.
No supporting details and/or examples provided.
Reader confused and annoyed.
Fair
Information is not entirely related to questions posed in introduction.
Supporting details and/or examples not directly related.
Reader finds little of interest.
Good
Information generally relates to the questions posed in the introduction.
1 supporting detail and/example is provided.
Reader generally enjoys piece.
Excellent
Information clearly relates to questions posed in the introduction.
1 or 2 supporting details and/or examples are used.
Reader finds some things of interest.
Outstanding
Information clearly and precisely relates to questions posed in the introduction.
3 or 4 unique, creative supporting details and/or examples are used.
Reader is veryinterested.
Summary
Poor
Important points not identified.
Conclusion does not relate to questions posed.
Fair
Both important and insignificant information are included.
Some gaps in logic relating conclusions to the questions posed.
Good
Mentions some important information.
Conclusions are generally reasonable and somewhat related to the questions posed.
Excellent
Highlights the most important information.
Conclusions are reasonable and relate to the questions posed.
Outstanding
Reinforces important information clearly.
Conclusions are logical and reasonable and clearly relate to the questions posed.
Grammar & Spelling
Poor
There are a number of major errors in punctuation, grammar and/or spelling which make it difficult to read.
Fair
There are 1 or 2 major errors in punctuation, grammar and/or spelling which do interrupt the flow for the reader.
Good
There are 3 or 4 minor errors in punctuation, grammar and/or spelling which do inot break the flow for the reader.
Excellent
There are 1 or 2 minor grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.
Outstanding
There are no grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors, or they relate to risk-taking on the part of the student.
Sources
Poor
No documentation of sources used, if any.
Formatting increases difficulty in reading
No sources or invalid ones.
Fair
Sources used are not accurately documented.
Fromat has gaps, errors or many changes.
Only 1 source was used.
Good
All sources are documented with only minor errors.
Format used is not consistent.
Only 1 source was used.
Excellent
All sources are accurately documented, with only a very minor error.
Uses desired format.
2 or 3 sources were used.
Outstanding
All sources are precisely and accurately documented.
Useds desired format.
4 or more sources were used.
Subjects:
Humanities
Science
Types:
Writing
(Other)
Discuss this rubric
You may also be interested in:
More rubrics by this author
More Humanities rubrics
More Writing rubrics
Do more with this rubric:
Preview
Preview this rubric.
Edit
Modify this rubric.
Copy
Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.
Print
Show a printable version of this rubric.
Categorize
Add this rubric to multiple categories.
Bookmark
Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
Test run
Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.
Grade
Build a gradebook to assess students.
Collaborate
Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share
Publish
Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.
Email
Email this rubric to a friend.
Discuss
Discuss this rubric with other members.
Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.
Only with iRubric
tm
.
Copyright © 2024
Reazon Systems, Inc.
All rights reserved.
n232
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.
Your browser does not support iframes.