- Username
- Password
forgot?

iRubric: Design Playing Card Theme rubric

edit print share Copy to my rubrics Bookmark test run assess... delete Do more...
Design Playing Card Theme Student will design a playing card theme including suits for the deck using Adobe Illustrator software. Rubric Code: ZX264C By cviolette Ready to use Public Rubric Subject: Arts and Design Type: Project Grade Levels: 9-12

Enter rubric title
	Poor 1 pts	Fair 2 pts	Good 3 pts	Excellent 4 pts
Pen Tool: Drawing Suit	Poor The suits shapes are not clear.	Fair The suits shapes are defined, but the spade and club are not complete shapes.	Good The suits shapes are defined, but one of either the club or spade are not complete shapes.	Excellent The suits shapes are defined, and both the club or spade are not complete shapes.
Logo of Deck	Poor The logo is does not meet any of the design principles, the colors do not harmonize, font choice is poor, and shows little evidence of original thought.	Fair The logo is does have good use of the design principles, the colors do not harmonize, and font choice is poor, and lacks of any sincere originality.	Good The logo is does have good use of the design principles, the colors do harmonize, and font choice is poor, but originality is demonstrated.	Excellent The logo is does have excellent use of the design principles, the colors do harmonize, and the font selection was a good choice, and the logo is completely unique.
Presentation	Poor Pieces were not mounted on a display board.	Fair Pieces were mounted on a display board, but the trimming of the pieces are poor, and not enough adhesive was used.	Good Pieces were mounted on a display board, and only a few of the pieces were trimmed poorly.	Excellent All work was mounted, trimming had clean neat edges.
Use of Software	Poor The file did not have a layer for each item, the file name was not saved as Name/Exam, use of tools was not demonstrated, and did not provide files of both an .ai and a .pdf.	Fair The file did not have layer for a few items, the file name was not saved as Name/Exam, use of tools was not demonstrated, and did not provide a .pdf file.	Good The file did not have layer for a less than few items, the file name was not saved as Name/Exam, use of tools was not demonstrated, and did not provide a .pdf file.	Excellent The file has a layer for each item, saved properly, and provided both .ai and .pdf files.