Skip to main content
iRubric: CWHP Internation Trade Presentation rubric

iRubric: CWHP Internation Trade Presentation rubric

find rubric

(draft) edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
CWHP Internation Trade Presentation 
Rubric Code: ZX25C2B
Draft
Public Rubric
Subject: History  
Type: Presentation  
Grade Levels: 9-12

Powered by iRubric Trade Presentation
Enter rubric description
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3 pts

Fair

2 pts

Poor

1 pts

Required Elements

A hearing by the World Trade Organization (WTO) to settle a product dumping dispute.

Excellent

• Vocabulary is defined, and realistic. countries and products are chosen that might be involved in a real dumping case.
•At least three props or written posters should be used that will help the audience understand the multiple perspectives involved.
•The consequences for the plaintiff and defending country are clear and easy to understand. Questions by the WTO help clarify the issues to the audience.
•The hearing ends with a ruling that takes into consideration both sides
Good

• Most Vocabulary is defined, and realistic countries and products have been chosen that might be involved in a real dumping case.
•At least two props or written posters should be used that will help the audience understand the multiple perspectives involved.
•The consequences to the plaintiff and defendant country are simple yet effective. Questions by the WTO are somewhat helpful to the audience.

•The hearing ends with a ruling that takes into consideration both sid
Fair

• Some of the Vocabulary is defined,and either the countries or products chosen represent what might be involved in a real dumping case.
•At least one prop or written poster should be used that will help the audience understand the multiple perspectives involved.
•The consequences to the plaintiff and defendant are vague and don't make sense. Questions by the WTO are unhelpful to the audience.
•The hearing ends with a ruling that takes into consideration only one side of the
Poor

•Vocabulary is not defined and neither the countries or products chosen are realistic of what might be involved in an actual dumping case.
•No props or written posters are used to help the audience understand the multiple perspectives involved.
•The consequences to the plaintiff and defendant are not given or explained. There are no questions by the WTO that might help clarify the issue for the audience.
•The hearing ends with no ruling
Delivery

Excellent

-Good posture
-Eye contact with the audience most of the time
-Appropriate gesture and expression
-Deliverance with confidence
-Full group participation
Good

-Good posture
-Frequent eye contact with the audience
-Appropriate gesture and expression
-Almost full group particiapation
Fair

-Intermittent good posture
-Occasional eye contact with the audience
-Appropriate gesture and expression
-Partial group presentation
Poor

-Poor posture
-Seldom eye contact with the audience
-Not enough or too much gesture and expression
-One person presentation.
Organization

Excellent

-Specific introduction and conclusion
-Sequenced material within the body
-Cohesive presentation content
Good

-Specific introduction and conclusion
-Sequenced material within the body
-Cohesive presentation content
Fair

-Specific introduction and conclusion
-Sequenced material within the body is inconsistent
Poor

-Specific introduction and conclusion
-No sequence in material
Subject Knowledge

Excellent

Group members demonstrate full knowledge (more than required) by answering all class questions with explanations and elaboration.
Good

Group members are at ease with expected answers to all questions, but members may fail to elaborate.
Fair

Group members are uncomfortable with information and members are able to answer only rudimentary questions.
Poor

Group members do not have grasp of information; members of group cannot answer questions about subject.
Elocution

Excellent

Group members use clear voices and correct, precise pronunciation of terms so that all audience members can hear presentation.
Good

Group member's voices are clear. and they pronounce most words correctly. Most audience members can hear presentation.
Fair

Group member's voices are low and they incorrectly pronounce terms. Audience members have difficulty hearing presentation.
Poor

Group Members mumble, incorrectly pronounce terms, and speak too quietly for students in the back of class to hear.




Subjects:






Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess
This rubric is still in draft mode and cannot be scored. Please change the rubric status to ready to use.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232