Skip to main content
iRubric: Adobe Creative Suite Introduction rubric

iRubric: Adobe Creative Suite Introduction rubric

find rubric

edit   print   share   Copy to my rubrics   Bookmark   test run   assess...   delete   Do more...
Adobe Creative Suite Introduction 
Adobe CS Integrated Suite demonstration of understanding and application uses.
Rubric Code: ZCX68A
Ready to use
Public Rubric
Subject: Business  
Type: Assignment  
Grade Levels: 9-12, Post Graduate

Powered by iRubric Graphic Design
Graphic Design 1
  Excellent

4 pts

Good

3.4 pts

Fair

3 pts

Poor

2.6 pts

Use of Class Time

Excellent

Used time well<BR>
during each class<BR>
period. Focused on<BR>
getting the project<BR>
done and ever<BR>
distracted others
Good

Used time well<BR>
during each class<BR>
period. Usually<BR>
focused on getting<BR>
the project done<BR>
and never distracted<BR>
others.
Fair

Used some of the<BR>
time well during<BR>
each class period.<BR>
There was some<BR>
focus on getting the<BR>
project done but<BR>
occasionally<BR>
distracted others.
Poor

Did not use class<BR>
time to focus on<BR>
the project OR<BR>
often distracted<BR>
others
Graphics Clarity

Excellent

Graphics are used<BR>
effectively and have<BR>
strong impact on<BR>
the total design.
Good

Most graphics are<BR>
used and generally<BR>
have an<BR>
impact on the<BR>
message of the<BR>
design
Fair

Most graphics are<BR>
focused on the<BR>
message of the<BR>
design project, but<BR>
could have been<BR>
used more effectively<BR>
by virtue of<BR>
size or location,<BR>
rhythm, etc.
Poor

Graphics fail to<BR>
convey the meaning<BR>
of the design<BR>
project and there is<BR>
a lack of understanding<BR>
demonstrated<BR>
by poor<BR>
sizing or placement.
Graphics Originality

Excellent

The graphics and<BR>
text used on the<BR>
design project<BR>
reflect a exceptional<BR>
degree of<BR>
student creativity<BR>
in their creation<BR>
and/or display.
Good

The graphics and<BR>
text used on the<BR>
design project<BR>
reflect student<BR>
creativity in their<BR>
creation and/or<BR>
display
Fair

The graphics and<BR>
text used by the<BR>
student, but are<BR>
based on the<BR>
designs or ideas of<BR>
others and don't<BR>
demonstrate original<BR>
ideas
Poor

Graphics and<BR>
text do not<BR>
demonstrate any<BR>
original thought<BR>
or creativity
Design Attractiveness

Excellent

The design project<BR>
is exceptionally<BR>
attractive in terms<BR>
of design, layout,<BR>
neatness, dominance,<BR>
rhythm, size, color, background, links, and graphics do not distract from the content and are consistent across the page.
Good

The design project<BR>
is attractive in terms<BR>
of design, layout<BR>
and neatness and<BR>
demonstrate an<BR>
understanding of<BR>
the use of design<BR>
tools. Most colors of the background, fonts, links, text, and graphics are pleasing to the eye, do not detract from the content, and are consistent across the page.
Fair

The design project is<BR>
acceptably attractive<BR>
though it may be a<BR>
bit disorganized and<BR>
does not demonstrate<BR>
a clear understanding<BR>
of layout:<BR>
dominance, size,<BR>
rhythm, balance,<BR>
etc
Poor

The design project<BR>
is distractingly<BR>
cluttered or<BR>
devoid of necessary<BR>
elements and<BR>
very poorly<BR>
designed. It is not<BR>
attractive.
Graphics Relevance

Excellent

All graphics are<BR>
related to the topic<BR>
and make it easier<BR>
to understand.
Good

All graphics are<BR>
related to the<BR>
topic and most<BR>
make it easier to<BR>
understand.
Fair

All graphics<BR>
relate to the<BR>
topic.
Poor

Graphics do not<BR>
relate to the topic
Essential Idea

Excellent

The student has an exceptional understanding of the essential idea and can easily answer questions about the content and procedures used to make the Glog.
Good

The student has a good understanding of the essential idea an can easily answer questions about the content and procedures used to make the Glog.
Fair

The student has a fair understanding of the essential idea an can easily answer questions about the content and procedures used to make the Glog.
Poor

The student has a poor understanding of the essential idea an can easily answer questions about the content and procedures used to make the Glog.
Content

Excellent

The Glog has a clearly stated purpose and theme; all written content is related directly to the purpose/theme. All written content is original and not copied.
Good

The Glog has a clearly stated purpose and theme; most written content is related directly to the purpose/theme. All written content is original and not copied.
Fair

The Glog has a clearly stated purpose and theme; most written content is related directly to the purpose/theme. Majority of the written content is NOT original.
Poor

Tue student does not have an understanding of the essential idea and can't answer most of the questions about the content nor procedures to make the Glog.
Grammar/Mechanics

Excellent

There are no grammatical or mechanical mistakes on the Glog.
Good

There are one or two grammatical or mechanical mistakes on the Glog.
Fair

There are three or four grammatical or mechanical mistakes on the Glog.
Poor

There are five or more grammatical or mechanical mistakes on the Glog.



Keywords:
  • Creative Visual Application Adobe Glogster


Types:





Do more with this rubric:

Preview

Preview this rubric.

Edit

Modify this rubric.

Copy

Make a copy of this rubric and begin editing the copy.


Print

Show a printable version of this rubric.

Categorize

Add this rubric to multiple categories.

Bookmark

Bookmark this rubric for future reference.
Assess

Test run

Test this rubric or perform an ad-hoc assessment.

Grade

Build a gradebook to assess students.

Collaborate

Apply this rubric to any object and invite others to assess.
Share

Publish

Link, embed, and showcase your rubrics on your website.

Email

Email this rubric to a friend.

Discuss

Discuss this rubric with other members.
 

Do more with rubrics than ever imagined possible.

Only with iRubrictm.



Copyright © 2024 Reazon Systems, Inc.  All rights reserved.
n232